AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K.
Right arrow Articles by McClure, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K.
Right arrow Articles by McClure, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 153, Issue 2, 413-417
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Digital venography of the lower extremity

KR Lee, AW Templeton, GG Cox, SJ Dwyer 3rd, and CB McClure

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City 66103.

A digital 33-cm fluoroscopic system equipped with conventional spot-film and digital or video hard-copy capabilities was evaluated for its usefulness in diagnosing deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities. The impact of different fluoroscopic field sizes, spatial resolution, and contrast variance was measured by using phantoms. The results indicate that the physical characteristics of the digital system are acceptable for lower-extremity venography. Digital fluoroscopic hard copy was compared with conventional spot films in 22 examinations. The digital examinations were as accurate as the conventional examinations. Procedure time, exposure to radiation, film costs, and repeated injections of contrast medium because of errors in exposure were reduced with the digital method. The need for extra technologists was eliminated. The advantages of digital radiographic displays, postprocessing, storage, and transmission were maximized. Digital fluoroscopic examinations were as accurate as conventional spot films and were found to have many advantages.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
P S Sidhu, R Alikhan, T Ammar, and D J Quinlan
Lower limb contrast venography: a modified technique for use in thromboprophylaxis clinical trials for the accurate evaluation of deep vein thrombosis
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2007; 80(959): 859 - 865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.