AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reeder, J.
Right arrow Articles by Andelman, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reeder, J.
Right arrow Articles by Andelman, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 153, Issue 3, 537-540
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

MR imaging of the knee in the sagittal projection: comparison of three-dimensional gradient-echo and spin-echo sequences

JD Reeder, SO Matz, L Becker, and SM Andelman

Department of Radiology, Franklin Square Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21237.

Fifty patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee had arthroscopic examinations after MR imaging with both a standard T1-weighted spin-echo (SE) sequence and a three-dimensional (3-D) gradient-echo sequence. This series permitted correlative evaluation of 100 menisci and 50 anterior cruciate ligaments. Meniscal tears were diagnosed when intrameniscal signal communicated with the meniscal surface. Criteria for diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament disruption included absence or discontinuity of the ligament, ligamentous laxity, and hyperflexion of the posterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopic surgery confirmed the presence of 39 meniscal tears and 11 anterior cruciate ligament tears in this population. The sensitivity and specificity of the SE sequence for the diagnosis of meniscal tears were 77% and 98%, respectively. The 3-D gradient-echo sequence had a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 88%. For disruption of the ligament, the SE technique had a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 95% and the 3-D technique had a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 100%. Although these differences in sensitivity and specificity are not statistically significant at the p less than .05 level, probably because of the small sample size, the results show the relative strengths and weaknesses of the two imaging sequences. These data suggest that because of the complementary results of the two MR techniques, both the SE and the 3-D gradient-echo sequences have a role in the diagnosis of knee injuries.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. C. Tarhan, C. B. Chung, A. V. R. Mohana-Borges, T. Hughes, and D. Resnick
Meniscal Tears: Role of Axial MRI Alone and in Combination with Other Imaging Planes
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2004; 183(1): 9 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. P. Spindler, J. P. Schils, J. A. Bergfeld, J. T. Andrish, G. G. Weiker, T. E. Anderson, D. W. Piraino, B. J. Richmond, and S. V. Medendorp
Prospective study of osseous, articular, and meniscal lesions in recent anterior cruciate ligament tears by magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1993; 21(4): 551 - 557.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.