AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fleckenstein, J.
Right arrow Articles by Peshock, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fleckenstein, J.
Right arrow Articles by Peshock, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 153, Issue 4, 693-698
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

1989 ARRS Executive Council Award. Exercise-enhanced MR imaging of variations in forearm muscle anatomy and use: importance in MR spectroscopy

JL Fleckenstein, LA Bertocci, RL Nunnally, RW Parkey, and RM Peshock

Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235.

31P MR spectroscopic studies of forearm exercise frequently assume that the volume sampled is appropriate for the muscle of interest and that individual variations in muscle anatomy and use are not important. Postexercise MR imaging was used to assess variations in the size, location, and use of forearm flexors and the accuracy of palpation as a method for locating the muscle of interest. By using the information obtained with MR, the effects of errors in surface-coil position relative to the muscle of interest on 31P MR spectroscopy were examined. In the midforearm of seven men, the greatest diameter of the flexor carpi ulnaris was 29 +/- 4 mm, and that of the flexor digitorum superficialis was 28 +/- 6 mm. However, in the proximal forearm, 58 +/- 10% of the diameter was covered by the palmaris longus, when present (79% of subjects). An unexpected finding was that a focal portion of the superficial finger flexor was used primarily as a wrist flexor in 26% of subjects. Palpation incorrectly identified flexor muscle margins by more than 15 mm in 50% of attempts. When a surface coil was positioned over wrist flexors during handgrip, attenuation of exercise-induced changes in 31P spectra resulted. Exercise-enhanced MR imaging reveals variations in forearm muscle anatomy and use that are common and difficult to appreciate by palpation. It therefore allows improved localization of the sensitive volume for MR spectroscopic studies of muscle physiology.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
Y. Takeda, S. Kashiwaguchi, K. Endo, T. Matsuura, and T. Sasa
The Most Effective Exercise for Strengthening the Supraspinatus Muscle : Evaluation by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2002; 30(3): 374 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
B. M. Prior, J. M. Foley, R. C. Jayaraman, and R. A. Meyer
Pixel T2 distribution in functional magnetic resonance images of muscle
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 1999; 87(6): 2107 - 2114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.