AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edelman, R.
Right arrow Articles by McArdle, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edelman, R.
Right arrow Articles by McArdle, C
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 153, Issue 4, 755-760
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

MR angiography and dynamic flow evaluation of the portal venous system

RR Edelman, B Zhao, C Liu, KU Wentz, HP Mattle, JP Finn, and C McArdle

Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, MA 02215.

We studied the value of MR angiographic techniques in imaging the portal venous system. Projection angiograms were created by postprocessing a series of two-dimensional, flow-compensated gradient-echo images. Flow velocity was determined by a bolus-tracking method with radiofrequency tagging and multiple data readout periods. Each image was acquired during a breath-hold. MR angiography was applied to six normal subjects and four patients with abnormal hemodynamics in the portal venous system. Flow velocity determined by MR was correlated with the results of duplex sonography. The main portal vein and intrahepatic branches were shown in all cases. Portosystemic collaterals were identified in all patients with portal hypertension. In normal subjects, peak flow velocities (17.9 +/- 2.8 cm/sec) on MR correlated well with values determined by duplex sonography (17.5 +/- 2.2 cm/sec) (r = .846, p less than .04). Reversed portal blood flow was shown in two patients. One patient with portal vein thrombosis had no evidence of flow by MR angiography. Our results indicate that MR angiography can provide a three-dimensional display of normal and abnormal vascular anatomy as well as functional information in the portal venous system.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Ito, S. Koike, C. Jo, A. Shimizu, H. Kanazawa, M. Miyazaki, S. Yamauchi, and N. Matsunaga
Intraportal Venous Flow Distribution: Evaluation with Single Breath-Hold ECG-Triggered Three-Dimensional Half-Fourier Fast Spin-Echo MR Imaging and a Selective Inversion-Recovery Tagging Pulse
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 343 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. Kreft, H. Strunk, S. Flacke, M. Wolff, R. Conrad, J. Gieseke, D. Pauleit, R. Bachmann, A. Hirner, and H. H. Schild
Detection of Thrombosis in the Portal Venous System: Comparison of Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography with Intraarterial Digital Subtraction Angiography
Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 86 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. Okumura, Y. Watanabe, M. Dohke, T. Ishimori, Y. Amoh, K. Oda, and Y. Dodo
Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Portography
RadioGraphics, July 1, 1999; 19(4): 973 - 987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
D. Kim, R. R. Edelman, C. J. Margolin, D. H. Porter, C. R. McArdle, B. W. Schlam, L. E. Gianturco, J. B. Siegel, and M. Simon
The Simon Nitinol Filter: Evaluation by MR and Ultrasound
Angiology, July 1, 1992; 43(7): 541 - 548.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
E. K. Yucel
Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 1990; 3(1): 35 - 47.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.