AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mathieson,
Right arrow Articles by Burhenne, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mathieson, , JR
Right arrow Articles by Burhenne, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 153, Issue 5, 977-980
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Accuracy of sonography for determining the number and size of gallbladder stones before and after lithotripsy

Mathieson JR, CB So, DE Malone, CD Becker, and HJ Burhenne

Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Accurate knowledge of gallstone number and size is required both for selection of patients for treatment by lithotripsy and for the evaluation of therapeutic results. We measured the accuracy of sonography for use in counting and measuring gallstones and gallstone fragments in a three-part study. First, specimen gallstones of known size were examined in a water bath with four different sonographic units. Second, seven pigs with surgically implanted gallstones had sonography before and after lithotripsy. Finally, we compared the measurements made on the preoperative sonogram with postoperative surgical specimen measurements in 27 patients who underwent cholecystectomy. In vitro gallstone measurement errors were 1.0 mm or less with each of the four sonographic units. In the animal experiments, all prelithotripsy measurements were highly accurate (+/- 1.1 mm). The animal postlithotripsy measurements were similarly accurate in five of seven cases, but substantial errors were made in the remaining two cases. In precholecystectomy patients, the sonographic stone counts and measurements were accurate in all 16 patients who had fewer than six stones. In all 11 patients with six or more stones, we correctly determined with sonography that at least six stones were present, but in only four of 11 cases was the largest stone measured accurately (+/- 2.0 mm). We conclude that sonography can be used accurately to count and measure gallstones when fewer than six stones are present, can reliably determine when six or more stones are present, and, in many cases, can determine the size of the largest fragments remaining after lithotripsy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
S. Jeraj
Cholelithasis: The Optimum Maneuvers to Improve Sonographic Assessment for Biliary Lithotripsy
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, March 1, 1992; 8(2): 64 - 67.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.