AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Platt, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Platt, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 153, Issue 5, 997-1000
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Distinction between obstructive and nonobstructive pyelocaliectasis with duplex Doppler sonography

JF Platt, JM Rubin, and JH Ellis

Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor 48109-0030.

Because animal studies have shown that renal obstruction increases renal vascular resistance, we theorized that obstruction would change the Doppler waveform. We studied the value of the resistive index (RI) calculated from the duplex Doppler waveform to distinguish between obstructive and nonobstructive pyelocaliectasis in 229 kidneys in 133 patients. The RI is the peak systolic frequency shift minus the minimum diastolic frequency shift, then divided by the peak systolic frequency shift. Duplex Doppler sonography was performed prospectively in 70 kidneys with pyelocaliectasis before the presence or absence of obstruction was established. In 54 of 70 kidneys, the presence or absence of obstruction was proved by interventional methods (percutaneous nephrostomy, antegrade or retrograde pyelography, loopography), and in the rest it was proved by body CT, excretory urography, or surgery. Thirty-eight kidneys were found to be obstructed, and 32 had nonobstructive dilatation. In addition, 159 kidneys without pyelocaliectasis were studied to identify possible limitations of Doppler sonography in the diagnosis of obstruction. Clinical history and laboratory data were used to determine that 109 of these kidneys were in normal subjects and 50 were in patients with nondilated renal disease. There was a significant difference between the mean RI of the obstructed (0.77 +/- 0.05) and the nonobstructed dilated (0.63 +/- 0.06) kidneys (p less than .01). Analysis of the receiver-operating-characteristic curve showed an RI of 0.70 to be a good discriminatory level for obstruction, resulting in a sensitivity of 92%, a specificity of 88%, and an accuracy of 90%. All 109 normal kidneys had an RI less than 0.70. Over half (27/50) of the kidneys in patients with nondilated renal disease had an elevated RI (greater than or equal to 0.70). Ninety-six patients had Doppler examinations on both kidneys, and in only six patients did the RI values of each kidney differ by more than 0.10; all six were proved to have unilateral obstruction. Use of duplex Doppler sonography should improve the specificity, and thus the accuracy, of sonography in the noninvasive diagnosis of obstruction and should be used when a dilated collecting system is identified.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Sigirci, T. Hallac, A. Akyncy, I. Temel, H. Gulcan, M. Aslan, M. Kocer, B. Kahraman, A. Alkan, and R. Kutlu
Renal interlobar artery parameters with duplex Doppler sonography and correlations with age, plasma Renin, and aldosterone levels in healthy children.
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 828 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. A. Akbar, S. Z. H. Jafri, M. A. Amendola, B. L. Madrazo, R. Salem, and K. G. Bis
Complications of Renal Transplantation
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1335 - 1356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
S J Freeman and H Sells
Investigation of loin pain
Imaging, August 1, 2005; 17(1): 19 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. O. Oktar, C. Yucel, H. Ozdemir, and D. Karaosmanoglu
Doppler Sonography of Renal Obstruction: Value of Venous Impedance Index Measurements
J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2004; 23(7): 929 - 936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N Karabulut, A Baki Yagci, and A Karabulut
Renal vein Doppler ultrasound of maternal kidneys in normal second and third trimester pregnancy
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2003; 76(907): 444 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. E. Tublin, R. O. Bude, and J. F. Platt
The Resistive Index in Renal Doppler Sonography: Where Do We Stand?
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 885 - 892.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. E. Tublin, F. N. Tessler, and M. E. Murphy
Correlation between Renal Vascular Resistance, Pulse Pressure, and the Resistive Index in Isolated Perfused Rabbit Kidneys
Radiology, October 1, 1999; 213(1): 258 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. O. Bude and J. M. Rubin
Relationship between the Resistive Index and Vascular Compliance and Resistance
Radiology, May 1, 1999; 211(2): 411 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
R. S. Schreiber and R. B. Kelly
Doppler Assessment of Renal Resistive Indices in Patients with Pregnancy Induced Hydronephrosis
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, March 1, 1992; 8(2): 68 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.