AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dantas, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kern, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dantas, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kern, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 153, Issue 6, 1191-1195
Copyright © 1989 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

The effect of high- vs low-density barium preparations on the quantitative features of swallowing

RO Dantas, WJ Dodds, BT Massey, and MK Kern

Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226.

We compared the effect of high-density and low-density barium preparations on the quantitative features of swallowing. The two barium preparations differed primarily in density but also differed somewhat in viscosity. Concurrent videofluoroscopic and manometric studies were done in nine healthy control subjects. Videofluoroscopy was recorded in the lateral projection at 30 frames/sec while concurrent manometry was done with five intraluminal transducers that straddled the pharynx and upper esophageal sphincter. Swallows of 5 and 10 ml of high- and low-density barium preparations were recorded. Analysis indicated that, compared with the low-density barium (1.4 g/cm3), the high-density barium (2.5 g/cm3) preparation had a slower oral and pharyngeal bolus transit time and caused significant quantitative differences in the function of the upper esophageal sphincter. Compared with low-density barium boluses, the high-density barium boluses were associated with later sphincter opening and closure, longer duration of sphincter opening and flow, lower flow rate, greater maximal anterior hyoid movement, greater sagittal sphincter diameter, and higher intrabolus pressure upstream of and within the sphincter. We conclude that the density as well as the viscosity of the barium preparation used in radiologic examination of the oral-pharyngeal phases of swallowing has an influence on bolus transit time through the mouth and pharynx, and on the quantitative features of upper esophageal sphincter opening. Although these quantitative differences cannot generally be recognized visually at fluoroscopy, they become important for the quantitative assessment of swallowing in patients with suspected disorders of oral-pharyngeal swallowing. Therefore, the basic barium preparations used to examine such patients should be either standardized or at least specified.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
S. K. Ghosh, J. E. Pandolfino, Q. Zhang, A. Jarosz, and P. J. Kahrilas
Deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter relaxation: a study of 75 volunteer subjects using solid-state high-resolution manometry
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, September 1, 2006; 291(3): G525 - G531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
J. A. Vanderhoof, J. R. Moran, C. L. Harris, K. L. Merkel, and S. R. Orenstein
Efficacy of a Pre-thickened Infant Formula: A Multicenter, Double-Blid, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Parallel Group Trial in 104 Infants with Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux
Clinical Pediatrics, July 1, 2003; 42(6): 483 - 495.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.