AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Totterman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Totterman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, R. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 154, 175-178, Copyright © 1990 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Diagnosis of femoropopliteal venous thrombosis with MR imaging: a comparison of four MR pulse sequences

S Totterman, CW Francis, TH Foster, B Brenner, VJ Marder and RG Bryant
Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY 14642.

In a prospective study, MR images were evaluated in seven patients with femoropopliteal venous thrombosis with symptoms of less than 5 days duration. T1-weighted (600/25 [TR/TE]), intermediate (2000/30), and T2- weighted (2000/100) spin-echo series and a gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state (GRASS) series were compared. Using venography as the standard for diagnosis, we found GRASS to be the most sensitive of the MR techniques, showing thrombi in all patients. It provided good contrast between the low-intensity thrombus and high- intensity flowing blood and also between thrombus and intermediate- or high-intensity perivascular tissues. The T1-weighted series was the least sensitive technique. All thrombi showed heterogeneity in the transaxial image with differences in signal between the peripheral and central regions. A higher intensity signal in the center than in the periphery at some level of the thrombus was found in six of seven T2- weighted or GRASS images. Heterogeneity in the signal intensity was more frequent in distal portions of thrombi, whereas the most proximal extent was homogeneous in appearance in six of seven cases. The heterogeneous appearance may be related to the greater age of the distal thrombus, because deep venous thrombi are known to begin in the calf and extend proximally over time. We conclude, on the basis of our experience with a small number of patients, that the GRASS MR technique is more sensitive for detecting acute deep venous thrombosis than T1- weighted, intermediate, and T2-weighted MR images.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. Corti, J. I. Osende, Z. A. Fayad, J. T. Fallon, V. Fuster, G. Mizsei, E. Dickstein, B. Drayer, and J. J. Badimon
In vivo noninvasive detection and age definition of arterial thrombus by MRI
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 17, 2002; 39(8): 1366 - 1373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
V. Tapson
The Diagnostic Approach to Acute Venous Thromboembolism . Clinical Practice Guideline
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 1999; 160(3): 1043 - 1066.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.