AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thoeni, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Schrock, T. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thoeni, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Schrock, T. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 154, 73-78, Copyright © 1990 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Ileoanal pouches: comparison of CT, scintigraphy, and contrast enemas for diagnosing postsurgical complications

RF Thoeni, SC Fell, B Engelstad and TB Schrock
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco 94143- 0628.

The value of CT of the pelvis, 111In-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy, and contrast enema (pouchography) for detecting postsurgical complications was assessed in 44 patients with total colectomy, rectal mucosectomy, and ileoanal pouches. Ileoanal pouches were created as reservoirs from an ileal loop that was anastomosed to the dentate line of the anus and stayed connected to the remainder of the ileum. This pouch preserves the normal defecatory pathway and eliminates disease- producing mucosa. A total of 57 sets of examinations revealed 22 cases of normal postoperative findings, 22 of pouchitis, 13 of abscess, and three of fistula. Overall sensitivity for detecting complications with pouchography was 60% (18 of 30 findings); with CT, 78% (28 of 36 findings); and with scintigraphy, 79% (23 of 29 findings). Pouchitis was best diagnosed by scintigraphy (sensitivity, 80%), followed by CT (sensitivity, 71%) and pouchography (sensitivity, 53%). Only CT correctly diagnosed all cases of abscess. Fistulas were frequently missed by all three methods. If tests were combined, the overall sensitivity rose to 93% for the combination CT/scintigraphy and to 86% for CT/pouchography, but did not improve for pouchography/scintigraphy (78%). For evaluation of complications in patients with ileoanal pouches, CT should be the initial test. If an abscess is found, no further tests are needed. If CT findings are negative, a scintigram should be obtained. Our data did not establish a clear role for pouchography.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. D. Crema, D. Richarme, L. Azizi, C. C. Hoeffel, J.-M. Tubiana, and L. Arrive
Pouchography, CT, and MRI features of ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis.
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): W594 - W603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. N. Nadgir, J. A. Soto, K. Dendrinos, B. C. Lucey, J. M. Becker, and F. A. Farraye
MRI of Complicated Pouchitis
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): W386 - W391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. C. L. Schutz, M. S. Levine, E. Y. Woo, and J. L. Rombeau
Antegrade Ileography for Evaluating a Distal Anastomotic Stricture After Loop Ileostomy
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2005; 184(3_supp): S56 - S57.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. E. Seggerman, M. Y. Chen, G. S. Waters, and D. J. Ott
Radiology of Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis Surgery
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 999 - 1002.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.