AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borushok, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Townsend, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Borushok, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Townsend, R. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 154, 275-278, Copyright © 1990 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Sonographic diagnosis of perforation in patients with acute appendicitis

KF Borushok, RB Jeffrey Jr, FC Laing and RR Townsend
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco General Hospital 94110.

The sonographic diagnosis of appendicitis can be challenging in patients with perforation. In order to detect the accuracy of specific sonographic features of appendiceal perforation, graded compression sonograms in 100 patients with surgically confirmed acute appendicitis were reviewed retrospectively. Twenty-two of these patients had perforation. A statistically significant association was found between three sonographic findings and perforation: loculated pericecal fluid, prominent pericecal fat, and circumferential loss of the submucosal layer of the appendix. No single finding had a specificity greater than 59%. By using a combination of one or more findings, the overall sensitivity of sonography for the diagnosis of perforation was 86%. The specificity, however, was only 60%. Our results suggest that in patients without a sonographically visible appendix, recognition of loculated pericecal fluid and prominent pericecal fat may be a useful indirect clue to the diagnosis of perforating appendicitis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N H Park, C S Park, E J Lee, M S Kim, J A Ryu, J M Bae, and J S Song
Ultrasonographic findings identifying the faecal-impacted appendix: differential findings with acute appendicitis
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2007; 80(959): 872 - 877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
E M Anderson and H K Bungay
Imaging investigation of acute right iliac fossa pain
Imaging, December 1, 2006; 18(4): 257 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
I. Chan, S. G. Bicknell, and M. Graham
Utility and Diagnostic Accuracy of Sonography in Detecting Appendicitis in a Community Hospital
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1809 - 1812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
T. Noguchi, K. Yoshimitsu, and M. Yoshida
Periappendiceal Hyperechoic Structure on Sonography: A Sign of Severe Appendicitis
J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2005; 24(3): 323 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. Poortman, P. N. M. Lohle, C. M. C. Schoemaker, H. J. M. Oostvogel, H. J. L. J. M. Teepen, K. A. H. Zwinderman, and J. F. Hamming
Comparison of CT and Sonography in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A Blinded Prospective Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2003; 181(5): 1355 - 1359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. M. Horrow, D. S. White, and J. C. Horrow
Differentiation of Perforated from Nonperforated Appendicitis at CT
Radiology, April 1, 2003; 227(1): 46 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. Simonovsky
Normal Appendix: Is There Any Significant Difference in the Maximal Mural Thickness at US between Pediatric and Adult Populations?
Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 333 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. J. Sivit, M. J. Siegel, K. E. Applegate, and K. D. Newman
When Appendicitis Is Suspected in Children
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2001; 21(1): 247 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. A. Birnbaum and S. R. Wilson
Appendicitis at the Millennium
Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 337 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
N. Damani and S. R. Wilson
Nongynecologic Applications of Transvaginal US
RadioGraphics, October 1, 1999; 19(90001): 179 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.