AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Baumgartner, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Baumgartner, B. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 154, 291-294, Copyright © 1990 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Gallstone extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: time and treatment considerations

RC Nelson, GA Rowland, WE Torres and BR Baumgartner
Biliary Lithotripsy Center, Crawford W. Long Hospital, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322.

We evaluated 30 gallstone lithotripsy procedures performed on 27 patients with the Dornier MPL-9000 Lithotripter to determine how time was spent in the lithotripsy suite and to evaluate the various technical reasons for interrupting the administration of shock waves during the treatment. The procedure averaged 98 +/- 32 min total time in the lithotripsy suite. This included an average of 22 +/- 6 min before the treatment, 70 +/- 28 min for administration of shock waves, and 6 +/- 2 min after the treatment. The time required to deliver the shock waves did not correlate with patient age, sex, or weight; the number of gallstones; or the number or date of the treatment. However, a trend was seen toward an association between shorter treatment times and larger stone volumes. On the average, the administration of shock waves was interrupted every 48 shock waves for various reasons. Electronically changing the imaging plane of the in-line sonographic transducer to retarget the stone in the focal zone was by far the most frequent reason for interrupting shock-wave delivery, averaging 56 shock waves between changes. We conclude that extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of gallstones is a time consuming and technically demanding procedure that requires continuous monitoring and frequent interruption in order to optimize targeting and fragmentation of the stone(s) while maintaining the patient's comfort.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.