AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Friefeld, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Friefeld, G. D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 154, 405-409, Copyright © 1990 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Diagnosis of synthetic vascular graft infection: comparison of CT and gallium scans

KK Johnson, PD Russ, JH Bair and GD Friefeld
Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver.

Sixteen patients were examined with both abdominal CT and 67Ga scintigraphy for suspected synthetic vascular graft infection. Two patients were studied twice, yielding a total of 18 paired tests. A total of 25 grafts were analyzed. The results of CT and 67Ga scintigraphy were compared for grafts in specific anatomic locations including the retroperitoneum, groin, and abdominal wall, and for combined sites. When all locations were considered as a group, CT had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 72%; 67Ga scintigraphy had a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 94%. 67Ga scintigraphy proved to be more specific than CT (p less than .05) for combined sites, but no significant difference in sensitivities was demonstrated, possibly because of the small number of infected grafts in our study. No differences in sensitivities or specificities were statistically significant when grafts in individual anatomic sites were analyzed. Since no significant difference between the sensitivities of CT and 67Ga scanning was demonstrated in our study, although the number of infected grafts was small, CT is recommended as the initial examination when graft infection is suspected because it can be performed immediately. 67Ga scintigraphy remains an important complementary test, adding specificity to the diagnostic workup.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
Y.-K. Chen, H.-C. Fang, K.-J. Chou, P.-T. Lee, and H.-M. Chung
A puzzling cause of persistent Pseudomonas aeruginosa septicaemia in a patient on maintenance haemodialysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2400 - 2402.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
T. W. Swain III, K. D. Calligaro, and M. D. Dougherty
Management of Infected Aortic Prosthetic Grafts
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, January 1, 2004; 38(1): 75 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 RadioGraphicsHome page
D. F. Orton, R. F. LeVeen, J. A. Saigh, W. C. Culp, J. L. Fidler, T. J. Lynch, T. C. Goertzen, and T. C. McCowan
Aortic Prosthetic Graft Infections: Radiologic Manifestations and Implications for Management
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2000; 20(4): 977 - 993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.