AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scanlan, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scanlan, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 154, 545-548, Copyright © 1990 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Value of transperineal sonography in the assessment of vaginal atresia

KA Scanlan, MA Pozniak, M Fagerholm and S Shapiro
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Clinical Science Center, Madison 53792.

We studied the value of transperineal sonography in the preoperative assessment of seven patients with clinically suspected vaginal atresia. Although transabdominal scanning is useful to determine if hydrocolpos or hydrometrocolpos is present, this method does not allow measurement of the thickness of a caudally placed obstructive septum. This information is useful in planning reconstructive surgery. All seven patients had transabdominal sonography, with five showing a low-lying obstruction. In those five patients, the distance between the perineal surface and the caudal aspect of the distended vagina, measured with electronic calipers on the transperineal sonograms, ranged from 1.0 to 4.0 cm. We conclude that when vaginal atresia is clinically suspected, transabdominal sonography should be performed to confirm the diagnosis. When a low-lying obstruction is identified, transperineal sonography should be performed to determine the length of the obstructive segment.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.V. Deffarges, B. Haddad, R. Musset, and B.J. Paniel
Utero-vaginal anastomosis in women with uterine cervix atresia: long-term follow-up and reproductive performance. A study of 18 cases
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2001; 16(8): 1722 - 1725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Fedele, A. Portuese, S. Bianchi, G. Zanconato, and R. Raffaelli
Transrectal ultrasonography in the assessment of congenital vaginal canalization defects
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 1999; 14(2): 359 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.