AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magid, D.
Right arrow Articles by Fishman, E. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Magid, D.
Right arrow Articles by Fishman, E. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 154, 1017-1023, Copyright © 1990 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Adult ankle fractures: comparison of plain films and interactive two- and three-dimensional CT scans

D Magid, JD Michelson, DR Ney and EK Fishman
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21208.

Thirteen patients with 15 ankle fractures potentially requiring surgical reduction according to plain film criteria were studied with transaxial CT, from which static and animated interactive two- dimensional (2-D) images and animated volumetric three-dimensional (3- D) images were generated. CT criteria believed to parallel well- accepted plain film criteria for triage of ankle fractures were developed and applied. The tibiofibular, talofibular, and tibiotalar articulations were characterized and, where possible (nine cases), compared with the (presumably normal) contralateral ankle. Talocrural angle measurements were made on interactive coronal measurements and compared with standard plain film measurements. Fracture fragment displacement, rotation, and impaction were noted. Posterior tibial lip disruption was quantified. Information derived from the 2-D/3-D CT study led to cancellation of proposed surgery in three of the distal fibular fractures and in two distal tibial fractures. There was far less variation than anticipated between the talocrural angles of the injured and normal ankles, and both injured and normal ankles deviated significantly from the accepted standard of 84 degrees. Displacement at the level of the fibular fracture was a poor predictor of more distal disruption. Two-dimensional CT was found to provide anatomic detail and information superior to either plain film or 3-D CT; 3-D CT was preferred by the surgeons for final surgical planning and for integration of the 2-D data. CT altered management in five of the 13 patients studied, supporting our belief that 2-D/3-D CT can be of significant value in assessing ankle fractures.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A D Reuben, S R Watt-Smith, D Dobson, and S J Golding
A comparative study of evaluation of radiographs, CT and 3D reformatted CT in facial trauma: what is the role of 3D?
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2005; 78(927): 198 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
R. H. Choplin, K. A. Buckwalter, J. Rydberg, and J. M. Farber
CT with 3D Rendering of the Tendons of the Foot and Ankle: Technique, Normal Anatomy, and Disease
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2004; 24(2): 343 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. S. Pretorius and E. K. Fishman
Volume-rendered Three-dimensional Spiral CT: Musculoskeletal Applications
RadioGraphics, September 1, 1999; 19(5): 1143 - 1160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.