AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Webber, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hawkins, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Webber, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hawkins, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 154, 975-981, Copyright © 1990 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Comparison of Biello, McNeil, and PIOPED criteria for the diagnosis of pulmonary emboli on lung scans

MM Webber, AS Gomes, D Roe, RL La Fontaine and RA Hawkins
Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine 90024.

The McNeil, Biello, and newly proposed PIOPED (from the National Institutes of Health-sponsored study, Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Detection) interpretive methods for detection of pulmonary embolism on lung scans were compared in 96 patients who also underwent pulmonary angiography. Segmental findings on 99mTc perfusion and aerosol ventilation scans, chest radiographs, and pulmonary angiograms obtained within 48 hr of each other were encoded along with other information into a data base to facilitate analysis. The McNeil, Biello, and PIOPED criteria were applied to the encoded data. Although the PIOPED set of criteria yielded the most favorable likelihood ratio for predicting an angiogram showing pulmonary emboli and a favorable likelihood ratio for predicting an angiogram not showing pulmonary emboli, it had the highest number of indeterminate studies. The McNeil criteria demonstrated the least favorable likelihood for predicting pulmonary emboli on an angiogram. The Biello and McNeil criteria showed the most favorable likelihood ratio for predicting an angiogram not showing pulmonary emboli. Analysis of receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves yielded the greatest area under the ROC curve for the Biello criteria, but there were no statistically significant differences among the three sets of criteria. This study suggests that the Biello scheme represents the best compromise of the sets of criteria studied.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
P. J. Hagen, I. J.C. Hartmann, O. S. Hoekstra, M. P.M. Stokkel, P. E. Postmus, and M. H. Prins
Comparison of Observer Variability and Accuracy of Different Criteria for Lung Scan Interpretation
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2003; 44(5): 739 - 744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN APPL THROMB HEMOSTHome page
E. J. R. van Beek, E. M. J. Brouwers, Bing Song, A. H. H. Bongaerts, and M. Oudkerk
Lung Scintigraphy and Helical Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-Analysis
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, April 1, 2001; 7(2): 87 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.