AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bosanko, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bosanko, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, A. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 155, 43-47, Copyright © 1990 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Optical spectroscopy (INVOS) is unreliable in detecting breast cancer

CM Bosanko, JK Baum, K Clark, D Barth-Jones and AJ Levine
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48072.

Recently a new nonionizing, nonimaging technique for evaluating risk of breast cancer, in vivo optical spectroscopy (INVOS), became available. The procedure evaluates the biochemical composition of the breast with spectrophotometry to provide a risk number related to the development of breast cancer. INVOS was evaluated in a prospective study of 180 women who were referred to our institution for needle localization and excisional biopsy of 181 breast lesions. All women had mammography and INVOS before surgical biopsy. The INVOS risk numbers and mammographic findings were compared with the pathologic diagnoses. Of 39 breast cancers, 19 (49%) had high-risk INVOS numbers, as did 52% of women with benign disease. INVOS had a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 4%, and a positive predictive value of 21% for the detection of breast cancer. Mammography predicted malignancy with a sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 48%, and a positive predictive value of 34%. Receiver-operating- characteristic (ROC) curve analysis also was performed. The ROC area for mammography was 0.85 compared with 0.43 for INVOS, indicating a significantly greater (p less than .0000001) ability for mammography to detect breast cancer. We conclude that because INVOS cannot accurately predict the presence of breast cancer, it is unlikely that INVOS can be used to predict which patients are at risk for the development of breast cancer.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.