AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vilgrain, V.
Right arrow Articles by Fekete, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vilgrain, V.
Right arrow Articles by Fekete, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 155, 277-281, Copyright © 1990 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Staging of esophageal carcinoma: comparison of results with endoscopic sonography and CT

V Vilgrain, D Mompoint, L Palazzo, Y Menu, B Gayet, P Ollier, H Nahum and F Fekete
Department of Radiology, Hopital Beaujon, Clichy, France.

We compared the results of endoscopic sonography and CT in the preoperative staging of 46 patients with esophageal carcinoma studied prospectively. All patients had surgery and 44 had pathologic examination of the mediastinal and celiac lymph nodes. The results of CT and endoscopic sonography were compared with surgical and pathologic findings. A total of 51 tumors were found in 46 patients. Sonographic estimation of tumor extension through the different layers of the esophagus was correct in 37 (73%) of all 51 tumors and in 22 (85%) of the 26 tumors in which the examination was complete. The echoendoscope (13-mm diameter) could not pass through the tumor in 23 cases (50%). Infiltration to adjacent organs was found in 15 cases at surgery. In four of these 15, the extension was detected by CT; in seven of the 15 cases, it was detected by sonography. False-negative determination of tumor extension occurred with endoscopic sonography in patients with stenotic tumor. There were no false-positive results with either CT or endoscopic sonography. For detection of mediastinal lymph-node involvement, the sensitivity of CT was 48%. The sensitivity of sonography was 50% if metastatic nodes unexplored by sonography were included, or 84% if only cases in which stenosis was passed were considered. Statistical comparison revealed that sonography was superior to CT for the detection of metastases to lymph nodes. CT and endoscopic sonography provide complementary information. When the echoendoscope can be maneuvered past the tumor, sonography can be used accurately to define extension through the layers of the esophagus, extension to the adjacent organs, and involvement of the lymph nodes. When the tumor cannot be passed by the echoendoscope, CT is superior to sonography for detection of mediastinal extension.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
S. Yuan, Y. Yu, K.S. C. Chao, Z. Fu, Y. Yin, T. Liu, S. Chen, X. Yang, G. Yang, H. Guo, et al.
Additional Value of PET/CT over PET in Assessment of Locoregional Lymph Nodes in Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 1255 - 1259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Umeoka, T. Koyama, K. Togashi, T. Saga, G. Watanabe, Y. Shimada, and M. Imamura
Esophageal Cancer: Evaluation with Triple-Phase Dynamic CT--Initial Experience
Radiology, June 1, 2006; 239(3): 777 - 783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. J. Lightdale and K. G. Kulkarni
Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Staging and Follow-Up of Esophageal Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2005; 23(20): 4483 - 4489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
W. Kneist, M. Schreckenberger, P. Bartenstein, C. Menzel, K. Oberholzer, and T. Junginger
Prospective Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography in the Preoperative Staging of Esophageal Carcinoma
Arch Surg, October 1, 2004; 139(10): 1043 - 1049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. C. Yoon, K. S. Lee, Y. M. Shim, B.-T. Kim, K. Kim, and T. S. Kim
Metastasis to Regional Lymph Nodes in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: CT versus FDG PET for Presurgical Detection— Prospective Study
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 764 - 770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
W H Allum, S M Griffin, A Watson, and D Colin-Jones
Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer
Gut, June 1, 2002; 50 (2007): v1 - v23.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
J Wayman, S Chakraverty, S M Griffin, G J Doyle, M J Keir, and W Simpson
Evaluation of local invasion by oesophageal carcinoma{---}a prospective study of prone computed tomography scanning
Postgrad. Med. J., March 1, 2001; 77(905): 181 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
C. E. Reed
Surgical Management of Esophageal Carcinoma
Oncologist, April 1, 1999; 4(2): 95 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. E. Reed, G. Mishra, A. V. Sahai, B. J. Hoffman, and R. H. Hawes
Esophageal cancer staging: improved accuracy by endoscopic ultrasound of celiac lymph nodes
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1999; 67(2): 319 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.