|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 155, 295-298, Copyright © 1990 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
LP Kaveggia, RR Perrella, EG Grant, FN Tessler, JT Rosenthal, A Wilkinson and GM Danovitch
Department of Radiological Sciences, UCLA School of Medicine 90024.
This study was undertaken to assess the significance of diastolic flow reversal seen on duplex Doppler sonograms of patients with renal transplant dysfunction. Earlier studies have evaluated the causes of increased vascular resistance in renal transplants. None, however, have investigated specifically the subset of patients in whom impedance in the renal microcirculation has increased to the degree that retrograde arterial flow is present. In our series, 533 consecutive scans in 270 patients were reviewed. The patients were referred for evaluation of renal transplant dysfunction during a 25-month period. Doppler samples were obtained from main, segmental, and, when possible, arcuate arteries. An episode of reversed diastolic flow was identified in nine patients. Correlation was made with clinical, laboratory, histologic (biopsy in six patients, nephrectomy in three patients), and imaging studies (DTPA scintigraphy in seven patients, angiography in one patient). On the basis of histologic and nephrectomy results, we determined that among the nine patients, four had acute tubular necrosis, three had acute rejection, and two had renal vein thrombosis. One of these patients had both severe rejection and renal vein thrombosis. One additional patient had neither biopsy nor nephrectomy and was not included in the diagnostic groups listed here. Our study suggests that reversed diastolic flow is not specific for either acute rejection or acute tubular necrosis. Reversal of diastolic flow, however, is a poor prognostic sign; nephrectomy was imminent in three of the nine patients. Furthermore, two (22%) patients had renal vein thrombosis, whereas renal vein thrombosis was not found in any of the 261 patients without reversed diastolic flow. Duplex Doppler examinations with reversed diastolic flow should suggest renal vein thrombosis.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. E. Lockhart, C. G. Wells, D. E. Morgan, N. S. Fineberg, and M. L. Robbin Reversed Diastolic Flow in the Renal Transplant: Perioperative Implications Versus Transplants Older Than 1 Month Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 650 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Park, J. K. Kim, and K.-S. Cho Complications of Renal Transplantation: Ultrasonographic Evaluation J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2007; 26(5): 615 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Akbar, S. Z. H. Jafri, M. A. Amendola, B. L. Madrazo, R. Salem, and K. G. Bis Complications of Renal Transplantation RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1335 - 1356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G M Baxter Imaging and renal transplantation Imaging, August 1, 2002; 14(4): 285 - 298. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. D. Brown, M. Y. M. Chen, N. T. Wolfman, D. J. Ott, and N. E. Watson Jr Complications of Renal Transplantation: Evaluation with US and Radionuclide Imaging RadioGraphics, May 1, 2000; 20(3): 607 - 622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. O. Bude and J. M. Rubin Relationship between the Resistive Index and Vascular Compliance and Resistance Radiology, May 1, 1999; 211(2): 411 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |