AJR AJR Reprints & E-prints Available. Order Today!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bisset, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Balistreri, W. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bisset, G. S., 3d
Right arrow Articles by Balistreri, W. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 155, 351-356, Copyright © 1990 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Evaluation of children for liver transplantation: value of MR imaging and sonography

GS Bisset 3d, JL Strife and WF Balistreri
Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.

Diagnostic imaging plays a major role in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic liver disease in children. Decisions regarding the need for sclerotherapy, palliative shunts, and anatomic suitability for hepatic transplantation are based on the upper abdominal anatomy. Thirty-six children with various forms of chronic liver disease were referred for diagnostic imaging, including MR and sonography. Each study was evaluated independently without knowledge of the other examination. The first six patients were evaluated retrospectively and the last 30 patients prospectively. The size of the portal vein and inferior vena cava varied in this population, with excellent agreement between sonography and MR. A 2-mm portal vein was shown only on MR imaging in two patients, but MR missed a 3-mm portal vein. Portosystemic collateral vessels also were evaluated and noted to be detected more readily with MR imaging (64%) than with sonography (22%). In particular, paraumbilical veins were detected more often with MR (28% vs 6% by sonography). Associated or coexisting anomalies were relatively common in children with chronic liver disease (14%). These included polysplenia (two cases), preduodenal portal vein (one), unilateral dysplastic kidneys (two), ureteropelvic junction obstruction (one), and splenic (one) and renal (one) cysts. MR imaging was more sensitive than sonography for detection of abnormal anatomy in this group of patients and should be considered the pretransplantation imaging technique of choice in children with end-stage liver disease.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.