AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelcz, F.
Right arrow Articles by Oberly, T. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelcz, F.
Right arrow Articles by Oberly, T. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 155, 531-535, Copyright © 1990 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Pyramidal appearance and resistive index: insensitive and nonspecific sonographic indicators of renal transplant rejection

F Kelcz, MA Pozniak, JD Pirsch and TD Oberly
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53792.

Renal transplantation patients undergoing biopsy were examined with duplex Doppler sonography to establish the sensitivity and specificity of this technique in the detection of rejection. The study population consisted of 89 consecutive patients, who received renal transplants 1 week to 17 years before our examination and underwent 96 core needle biopsies within 24 hr of sonography. The resistive index (RI), defined as the difference between the peak systolic and end diastolic flow velocities divided by the peak systolic velocity (expressed as a percentage), was measured in the main, segmental, interlobar, and arcuate renal arteries. Furthermore, the prominence of the renal pyramids, as determined by their size and echogenicity, was prospectively evaluated. Biopsy was used to establish diagnosis, but in cases of equivocal results, hospital course was the final arbiter. The most frequent diagnoses in the patients were acute rejection (41 patients) and chronic rejection (19 patients). Receiver-operating- characteristic curve analysis established that, regardless of the vessel in which it was measured, the use of RI to assign a diagnosis of acute rejection was no better than establishing this in a random manner. We did note, however, that patients with chronic rejection or cyclosporine toxicity were unlikely to have RIs greater than 80%. We further found that prominent pyramids were neither sensitive nor specific in the detection of acute rejection and that prominent pyramids were not correlated with elevated RI.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Saracino, G. Santarsia, A. Latorraca, and V. Gaudiano
Early assessment of renal resistance index after kidney transplant can help predict long-term renal function
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2916 - 2920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. E. Tublin, R. O. Bude, and J. F. Platt
The Resistive Index in Renal Doppler Sonography: Where Do We Stand?
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 885 - 892.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
G M Baxter
Imaging and renal transplantation
Imaging, August 1, 2002; 14(4): 285 - 298.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
B. N. Josiah JR, G. A. Rouse, and D. M. Williams
A Reevaluation of the Use of Sonography in the Renal Transplant
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, November 1, 1991; 7(6): 339 - 344.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.