American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 155, 751-753, Copyright © 1990 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Computerized follow-up of abnormalities detected at mammography screening

DL Monticciolo and EA Sickles
Department of Radiology, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco 94143.

Obtaining follow-up information after abnormal interpretations is an important aspect of a mammography practice, but it can be tedious, time- consuming, and produce suboptimal results. This study demonstrates the effect of computer-generated reminders on the collection of follow-up data for patients in whom abnormalities were detected at mammography screening. From April 1985 until December 1987, follow-up data for 1009 abnormal examinations were collected by using standard procedures, supplemented by occasional searches of pathology records and sporadic letters and telephone calls to referring physicians. Results showed that follow-up was limited to a normal physical examination in 104 women (10.3%); eight other women (0.8%) were lost to follow-up. For over 90% of these inadequately followed cases, referring physicians were first contacted more than 3 months after screening. Since December 1987, follow-up data for 777 abnormal examinations were collected, supplemented by computer-generated reminders sent to referring physicians for cases apparently unresolved 3 months after screening. Only four (0.5%) of these women have had inadequate follow-up (normal physical examination alone). We conclude that use of a computer- generated reminder system prompts more timely and more appropriate patient management. It also makes follow-up data collection much less onerous.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. R. Yabroff, K. S. Washington, A. Leader, E. Neilson, and J. Mandelblatt Is the Promise of Cancer-Screening Programs Being Compromised? Quality of Follow-Up Care after Abnormal Screening Results Med Care Res Rev, September 1, 2003; 60(3): 294 - 331. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Kerlikowske, P. A. Carney, B. Geller, M. T. Mandelson, S. H. Taplin, K. Malvin, V. Ernster, N. Urban, G. Cutter, R. Rosenberg, et al. Performance of Screening Mammography among Women with and without a First-Degree Relative with Breast Cancer Ann Intern Med, December 5, 2000; 133(11): 855 - 863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Kerlikowske, D. Grady, J. Barclay, E. A. Sickles, and V. Ernster Effect of Age, Breast Density, and Family History on the Sensitivity of First Screening Mammography JAMA, July 3, 1996; 276(1): 33 - 38. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Kerlikowske, D. Grady, J. Barclay, E. A. Sickles, A. Eaton, and V. Ernster Positive Predictive Value of Screening Mammography by Age and Family History of Breast Cancer JAMA, November 24, 1993; 270(20): 2444 - 2450. [Abstract] [PDF]