AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Resch, H.
Right arrow Articles by Willvonseder, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Resch, H.
Right arrow Articles by Willvonseder, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 155, 825-828, Copyright © 1990 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Broadband ultrasound attenuation: a new diagnostic method in osteoporosis

H Resch, P Pietschmann, P Bernecker, E Krexner and R Willvonseder
Medical Department, Krakenhaus der Barmherzigen Bruder, Vienna, Austria.

Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) measurements of the calcaneus, single-photon absorptiometry (SPA) of the nondominant distal forearm, and quantitative CT (QCT) of the lumbar spine were performed in 37 women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures and 23 female control subjects of similar age distribution to assess the usefulness of sonography in detecting axial osteopenia. In the women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures, all three measuring methods showed significantly reduced values (SPA: p less than .05; QCT: p less than .0001; BUA: p less than .05) compared with those in the control subjects. In addition, for all subjects, a significant positive correlation was found between BUA and QCT (tau = 0.25, p less than .005) and between SPA and QCT (tau = 0.34, p less than .0001). These results suggest that BUA, a simple method that is radiation-free, is a valuable tool in the management of osteoporosis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
B. Larijani, M. H. Dabbaghmanesh, S. Aghakhani, M. Sedaghat, Z. Hamidi, and E. Rahimi
Correlation of Quantitative Heel Ultrasonography With Central Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometric Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women
J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2005; 24(7): 941 - 946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Grampp, C. Henk, Y. Lu, C. Krestan, H. Resch, F. Kainberger, S. Youssefzadeh, F. Vorbeck, and H. Imhof
Quantitative US of the Calcaneus: Cutoff Levels for the Distinction of Healthy and Osteoporotic Individuals
Radiology, August 1, 2001; 220(2): 400 - 405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.