AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meglin, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ghaed, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meglin, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ghaed, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 155, 1267-1272, Copyright © 1990 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Cloacal exstrophy: radiologic findings in 13 patients

AJ Meglin, RJ Balotin, JS Jelinek, EK Fishman, RD Jeffs and V Ghaed
Department of Radiology, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307-5001.

Cloacal exstrophy is a complex, multisystem malformation that has not received much attention in the radiologic literature. The clinical histories and imaging studies of 13 cases of cloacal exstrophy proved surgically or at autopsy were reviewed. Radiologic observations were based on skeletal plain films (13), contrast-enhanced examinations of the genitourinary system (12), abdominopelvic sonograms (nine), gastrointestinal studies (seven), CT scans of the pelvis and CNS (seven), MR images of the pelvis and CNS (six), renal nuclear medicine scans (three), myelography (three), and three-dimensional scans of the pelvis (two). Genitourinary and gastrointestinal abnormalities identified in our 13 patients included bladder malformations (13), hindgut anomalies (13), undescended testes (five), malrotation (five), duplicated mullerian structures (four), and renal ectopia (four). Skeletal abnormalities included symphysis pubis diastasis (13), posterior element dysraphism (12), vertebral segmentation anomalies (12), clubfeet (six), and hip dislocations (five). CNS anomalies included meningocele (nine) and Chiari malformation (one). Immediate surgical closure of the defect with maximal bowel preservation and diverting colostomy offers optimal chances for survival. Appropriate preoperative gastrointestinal and genitourinary evaluation is essential.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ImagingHome page
C Brenner and R de Bruyn
Imaging of benign paediatric gynaecological disorders
Imaging, June 1, 2003; 15(2): 53 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.