AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grist, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sostman, H. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grist, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sostman, H. D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 156, 105-112, Copyright © 1991 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

1990 ARRS Executive Council Award. Renal transplant rejection: diagnosis with 31P MR spectroscopy

TM Grist, HC Charles and HD Sostman
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

We evaluated the role of 31P MR spectroscopy in the diagnosis of renal transplant allograft dysfunction. Thirty-six 31P MR spectroscopy examinations were prospectively performed in 35 patients with renal allografts. The study was performed in two phases. In the first phase, 12 transplant recipients with normal graft function were studied as normal controls. During phase two, 24 31P MR spectroscopy studies were performed in patients at the time of renal transplant biopsy for allograft dysfunction. Twenty-one of these studies were technically adequate. Pathologic analysis of the biopsy specimens showed evidence of allograft rejection in 14 and no rejection in seven. Various phosphorus metabolite ratios were calculated for each patient, including phosphodiesters/phosphomonoesters (PDE/PME), phosphomonoesters/inorganic phosphate (PME/Pi), and inorganic phosphate/adenosine triphosphate (Pi/ATP). The PDE/PME and Pi/ATP ratios in the allografts with rejection differed significantly from the corresponding metabolite ratios in patients without rejection (p = .017 and p = .024, respectively). A PDE/PME ratio exceeding 0.8 had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 86% for predicting rejection. A Pi/ATP ratio greater than 0.6 had a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 86% for predicting rejection. We conclude that 31P MR spectroscopy may be useful as a noninvasive method for evaluating renal metabolism during episodes of transplant allograft dysfunction.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Diabetes CareHome page
P. Fiorina, G. Perseghin, F. De Cobelli, C. Gremizzi, A. Petrelli, L. Monti, P. Maffi, L. Luzi, A. Secchi, and A. Del Maschio
Altered Kidney Graft High-Energy Phosphate Metabolism in Kidney-Transplanted End-Stage Renal Disease Type 1 Diabetic Patients: A cross-sectional analysis of the effect of kidney alone and kidney-pancreas transplantation
Diabetes Care, March 1, 2007; 30(3): 597 - 603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.