AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chakeres, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chakeres, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 156, 161-172, Copyright © 1991 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Normal venous anatomy of the brain: demonstration with gadopentetate dimeglumine in enhanced 3-D MR angiography

DW Chakeres, P Schmalbrock, M Brogan, C Yuan and L Cohen
Department of Radiology, Ohio State University Hospital, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus 43210.

This investigation evaluates whether gadopentetate dimeglumine enhancement of three-dimensional (3-D) acquisition MR angiography can generate clinically useful images of the normal venous anatomy of the brain. 3-D MR angiography of normal cerebral arterial anatomy has made rapid progress, although demonstration of detailed venous anatomy with similar techniques has been much less revealing. To overcome the limitation of slow venous flow, IV gadopentetate dimeglumine contrast enhancement was used to alter the relaxation times of blood, thus augmenting the venous signal. Several groups of patients were evaluated: we studied eight patients both with and without contrast enhancement, 20 patients and volunteers with multiple techniques to determine optimal technical parameters, and seven patients in whom enhanced MR studies were compared with standard selective biplane cut- film arterial angiograms. Only the large dural sinuses (such as the transverse sinus) could be seen on unenhanced studies owing to the saturation of slowly flowing venous spins. With contrast enhancement, many of the important small and large cerebral venous structures were routinely seen with reasonable scanning times (7 min). The venous anatomy was well seen for approximately one-half hour after injection and correlated well with angiograms. There are several important limitations to this technique, including a limited field of view, variable visibility of specific veins owing to technical and physiologic factors, confusion of enhancing non-flow-related structures, and lack of detailed physiologic information. Single excitation 3-D MR angiograms are insensitive in the evaluation of cerebral venous structures. Enhancement with gadopentetate dimeglumine affords rapid scanning and excellent visualization of the pertinent venous anatomy. The best image quality was obtained with a sequence of 50/7/30 degrees (TR/TE/flip angle).
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 RadiologyHome page
K. Kirchhof, T. Welzel, O. Jansen, and K. Sartor
More Reliable Noninvasive Visualization of the Cerebral Veins and Dural Sinuses: Comparison of Three MR Angiographic Techniques
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 804 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.