|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 156, 307-312, Copyright © 1991 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
H Levenson, F Greensite, J Hoefs, L Friloux, G Applegate, E Silva, G Kanel and R Buxton
Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California-Irvine Medical Center, Orange 92668.
Quantification of hepatic fat content by application of MR phase- contrast imaging (Dixon method) at 1.5 T was compared with results of biopsy in 16 patients with a variety of liver abnormalities. Motion artifact was suppressed by employing six or eight averages of short TR in-phase (echo offset, 0 msec), out-of-phase (echo offset, 1.1 msec), and in-phase (echo offset, 2.2 msec) spin-echo pulse sequences. The 360 degree out-of-phase sequence was used to assess the impact of T2* decay on this method of estimating fat fraction. A standard two-echo long TR sequence also was obtained in all patients. Histologic preparations from the biopsy specimens were examined by a pathologist who had no knowledge of the MR results and were graded according to overall visual assessment as belonging to one of four categories of fat fraction. Results of the MR-calculated apparent fat fraction were compared directly with biopsy category and were also placed in MR fat fraction categories, allowing estimation of the statistical correlation between the biopsy and MR grading systems. Eight of eight patients with biopsy categories indicating a fat fraction of less than 0.25 were computed by MR to have a fat fraction of less than 0.1. Seven of eight patients with biopsy categories indicating a fat fraction of greater than 0.25 were computed by MR to have a fat fraction of at least 0.24. The MR- calculated apparent fat fraction category correlated significantly with the histologic biopsy category (r = .86, p less than .01). When compared with the in-phase image, decreased signal from liver was visually apparent on the 180 degree out-of-phase images in all cases in which the fat fraction was at least 0.24, but there was no indication of fatty liver on the standard T1- or T2-weighted images. Calculated T2 also showed no correlation with degree of fatty deposition. Correction for T2* decay by using the 360 degree out-of-phase acquisition in addition to the standard 0 degree and 180 degree out-of-phase images had little effect on fat fraction computation. Phase-contrast MR is a promising noninvasive method for quantitative assessment of fatty deposition in the liver.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. G. Lall, A. M. Aisen, N. Bansal, and K. Sandrasegaran Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 993 - 1002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kodama, C. S. Ng, T. T. Wu, G. D. Ayers, S. A. Curley, E. K. Abdalla, J. N. Vauthey, and C. Charnsangavej Comparison of CT Methods for Determining the Fat Content of the Liver Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1307 - 1312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. A. Westphalen, A. Qayyum, B. M. Yeh, R. B. Merriman, J. A. Lee, A. Lamba, Y. Lu, and F. V. Coakley Liver Fat: Effect of Hepatic Iron Deposition on Evaluation with Opposed-Phase MR Imaging Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 450 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. An, J. M. Lee, K.-S. Suh, N. J. Lee, S. H. Kim, Y. J. Kim, J. K. Han, and B. I. Choi Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced liver MRI as the sole preoperative imaging technique: a prospective study of living liver donors. Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): 1223 - 1233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Chang, B. Taouli, N. Salibi, E. M. Hecht, D. G. Chin, and V. S. Lee Opposed-phase MRI for fat quantification in fat-water phantoms with 1H MR spectroscopy to resolve ambiguity of fat or water dominance. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): W103 - W106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Kim, J. M. Lee, J. K. Han, J. Y. Lee, K. H. Lee, C. J. Han, J. Y. Jo, N.-J. Yi, K.-S. Suh, K.-S. Shin, et al. Hepatic Macrosteatosis: Predicting Appropriateness of Liver Donation by Using MR Imaging--Correlation with Histopathologic Findings Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 116 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Qayyum, J. S. Goh, S. Kakar, B. M. Yeh, R. B. Merriman, and F. V. Coakley Accuracy of Liver Fat Quantification at MR Imaging: Comparison of Out-of-Phase Gradient-Echo and Fat-saturated Fast Spin-Echo Techniques--Initial Experience Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 507 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Kim, J. M. Lee, J. Y. Lee, J. K. Han, S. K. An, C. J. Han, K. H. Lee, S. S. Hwang, and B. I. Choi Value of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography for the Characterization of Focal Hepatic Lesions in Patients with Diffuse Liver Disease: Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1077 - 1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Kim, J. M. Lee, J. H. Kim, K. G. Kim, J. K. Han, K. H. Lee, S. H. Park, N.-J. Yi, K.-S. Suh, S. K. An, et al. Appropriateness of a Donor Liver with Respect to Macrosteatosis: Application of Artificial Neural Networks to US Images--Initial Experience Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 793 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Yao, T. Namimoto, Y. Yamashita, K. Mitsuzaki, Y. Nakayama, O. Makita, M. Katoda, and M. Takahashi Routine Opposed-Phase FLASH MR Imaging Does Not Quantify Fat Content Drs Namimoto and colleagues respond: Radiology, October 1, 2001; 221(1): 274 - 274. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Keogan and R. R. Edelman Technologic Advances in Abdominal MR Imaging Radiology, August 1, 2001; 220(2): 310 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Namimoto, Y. Yamashita, K. Mitsuzaki, Y. Nakayama, O. Makita, M. Kadota, and M. Takahashi Adrenal Masses: Quantification of Fat Content with Double-Echo Chemical Shift In-Phase and Opposed-Phase FLASH MR Images for Differentiation of Adrenal Adenomas Radiology, March 1, 2001; 218(3): 642 - 646. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Cuenod, I. Leconte, N. Siauve, A. Resten, C. Dromain, B. Poulet, F. Frouin, O. Clément, and G. Frija Early Changes in Liver Perfusion Caused by Occult Metastases in Rats: Detection with Quantitative CT Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 556 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hirohashi, K. Ueda, H. Uchida, W. Ono, J. Takahama, M. Takewa, S. Kitano, and H. Ohishi Nondiffuse Fatty Change of the Liver: Discerning Pseudotumor on MR Images Enhanced with Ferumoxides-Initial Observations Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 415 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Sohaib, P. D. Peppercorn, C. Allan, J. P. Monson, A. B. Grossman, G. M. Besser, and R. H. Reznek Primary Hyperaldosteronism (Conn Syndrome): MR Imaging Findings Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 527 - 531. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |