AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, D. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 156, 333-336, Copyright © 1991 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

MR of the knee: the significance of high signal in the meniscus that does not clearly extend to the surface

PA Kaplan, NL Nelson, KL Garvin and DE Brown
Department of Radiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68105.

On MR images of the knee it is sometimes impossible to determine with confidence if a focus of high signal in the meniscus is confined to the substance of the meniscus or if it extends to involve the surface. This is a critical differentiation because the latter represents meniscal tears that can be found and treated at arthroscopy, whereas the former represents degeneration, tears, or perhaps normal variants that cannot be detected or treated arthroscopically. We make an equivocal diagnosis of a tear when it is difficult to decide if signal in a meniscus involves the meniscal surface. We studied MR scans of the knee in 142 consecutive patients for the presence of such equivocal tears. Their prevalence was 14% (20/142); 17 were in the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus and three were in the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. In 13 cases with arthroscopy/arthrotomy correlation, no tears were found. In one of the 20 patients in whom the meniscus was removed during arthroplasty, histologic examination of the meniscus showed separation of collagen bundles, which was caused by meniscal degeneration confined to the substance of the meniscus. These results suggest that a meniscal tear is unlikely when MR scans show a focus of high signal in a meniscus that does not unequivocally extend to involve the surface of the meniscus.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
R. Crawford, G. Walley, S. Bridgman, and N. Maffulli
Magnetic resonance imaging versus arthroscopy in the diagnosis of knee pathology, concentrating on meniscal lesions and ACL tears: a systematic review
Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2007; 84(1): 5 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. C. Vande Berg, J. Malghem, P. Poilvache, B. Maldague, and F. E. Lecouvet
Meniscal Tears with Fragments Displaced in Notch and Recesses of Knee: MR Imaging with Arthroscopic Comparison
Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 842 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. E. Antonio, J. F. Griffith, and D. K. W. Yeung
Small-Field-of-View MRI of the Knee and Ankle
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2004; 183(1): 24 - 28.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
S Ostlere
Imaging the knee
Imaging, December 1, 2003; 15(4): 217 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. L. Cothran Jr., N. M. Major, C. A. Helms, and L. D. Higgins
MR Imaging of Meniscal Contusion in the Knee
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 1189 - 1192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. J. Khanna, A. J. Cosgarea, M. A. Mont, B. M. Andres, B. G. Domb, P. J. Evans, D. A. Bluemke, and F. J. Frassica
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Knee : Current Techniques and Spectrum of Disease
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2001; 83(90022): S128 - 141.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. S. Kocher, J. DiCanzio, D. Zurakowski, and L. J. Micheli
Dignostic Performance of Clinical Examination and Selective Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Intraarticular Knee Disorders in Children and Adolescents
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2001; 29(3): 292 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. C. Vande Berg, P. Poilvache, F. Duchateau, F. E. Lecouvet, J. E. Dubuc, B. Maldague, and J. Malghem
Lesions of the Menisci of the Knee: Value of MR Imaging Criteria for Recognition of Unstable Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2001; 176(3): 771 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
E. Rath and J. C Richmond
The menisci: basic science and advances in treatment
Br. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2000; 34(4): 252 - 257.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. A. Tung, D. Entzian, A. Green, and J. M. Brody
High-Field and Low-Field MR Imaging of Superior Glenoid Labral Tears and Associated Tendon Injuries
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2000; 174(4): 1107 - 1114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. F. LaPrade, Q. M. Burnett II, M. A. Veenstra, and C. G. Hodgman
The Prevalence of Abnormal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Asymptomatic Knees: With Correlation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Arthroscopic Findings in Symptomatic Knees
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1994; 22(6): 739 - 745.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.