|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 157, 37-40, Copyright © 1991 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
RA Halvorsen Jr, C Panushka, GJ Oakley, JG Letourneau and LL Adcock
Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.
The preoperative detection of peritoneal metastases from gynecologic malignancies is difficult; in particular, CT often fails to detect peritoneal implants. This study was designed to determine if the administration of intraperitoneal iodinated contrast media would increase the CT detection of such peritoneal metastases. Prospectively, both standard and intraperitoneal contrast-enhanced CT studies of the abdomen and pelvis were performed in 16 patients with suspected gynecologic tumors. All patients then underwent operative staging, with the location and number of metastases documented. The intraperitoneal enhanced CT studies were more sensitive in the detection of peritoneal metastases than standard CT examinations. Whereas routine CT detected peritoneal metastases in seven (64%) of 11 patients with surgically proved implants, the intraperitoneal enhanced CT studies detected peritoneal metastases in all 11 patients. Depending on the specific intraperitoneal compartments involved, the sensitivity of intraperitoneal enhanced CT in the detection of peritoneal metastases was two- to fourfold greater than that of standard CT examinations. Our results suggest that intraperitoneal enhanced CT is superior to standard CT in the detection of peritoneal metastases.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. S. Lim, M. J. Yun, M.-J. Kim, W. J. Hyung, M.-S. Park, J.-Y. Choi, T.-S. Kim, J. D. Lee, S. H. Noh, and K. W. Kim CT and PET in Stomach Cancer: Preoperative Staging and Monitoring of Response to Therapy RadioGraphics, January 1, 2006; 26(1): 143 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yoshida, T. Kurokawa, K. Kawahara, T. Tsuchida, H. Okazawa, Y. Fujibayashi, Y. Yonekura, and F. Kotsuji Incremental Benefits of FDG Positron Emission Tomography over CT Alone for the Preoperative Staging of Ovarian Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2004; 182(1): 227 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Woodward, K. Hosseinzadeh, and J. S. Saenger From the Archives of the AFIP: Radiologic Staging of Ovarian Carcinoma with Pathologic Correlation RadioGraphics, January 1, 2004; 24(1): 225 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-M. Cho, H. K. Ha, J. Y. Byun, J. M. Lee, C. J. Kim, S. E. Nam-Koong, and J. M. Lee Usefulness of FDG PET for Assessment of Early Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 391 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. V. Coakley, P. H. Choi, C. A. Gougoutas, B. Pothuri, E. Venkatraman, D. Chi, A. Bergman, and H. Hricak Peritoneal Metastases: Detection with Spiral CT in Patients with Ovarian Cancer Radiology, May 1, 2002; 223(2): 495 - 499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kawamoto, B. A. Urban, and E. K. Fishman CT of Epithelial Ovarian Tumors RadioGraphics, October 1, 1999; 19(90001): 85 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |