AJR Customized AJR reprints in quantities as low as 100!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ros, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by McGorray, S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ros, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by McGorray, S. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 157, 761-767, Copyright © 1991 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

The value of barium as a gastrointestinal contrast agent in MR imaging: a comparison study in normal volunteers

PR Ros, RM Steinman, GM Torres, SS Burton, JL Panaccione, DC Rappaport and SP McGorray
Department of Radiology, JHMHC, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville 32610-0374.

Preliminary data suggest that barium sulfate suspension is a potentially useful negative gastrointestinal contrast agent for MR imaging. To evaluate this hypothesis in a controlled fashion, abdominal and pelvic MR studies of 10 normal volunteers were performed before and after both oral (600-900 ml) and rectal (400 ml) administration of barium. Standard spin-echo coronal T1-, axial T1-, proton density-, and T2-weighted images were obtained at 1.5 T. Images obtained were randomized and interpreted by three observers, who evaluated bowel visualization and delineation of normal anatomy. Bowel segments evaluated were stomach, duodenum, proximal small bowel, proximal colon, distal colon, and rectum. Anatomic structures examined were pancreatic head, pancreatic body, pancreatic tail, retroperitoneum, spleen, liver, pelvic side walls, uterus, vagina, bladder, prostate, and seminal vesicles. Data concerning barium tolerance and safety were recorded. Descriptive, percent change, and kappa statistics were analyzed. Pairwise agreement techniques and repeated measures analysis of variance were performed. This statistical assessment showed a significant improvement in both bowel visualization (59-123% improvement, depending on the segment) and delineation of normal anatomy (23-68% improvement, depending on the structure) after barium administration, particularly on T1-weighted images. In addition, barium was a well-tolerated and safe contrast agent that did not produce artifacts. Our results show that barium sulfate is a useful negative gastrointestinal contrast agent for MR because it improves bowel visualization and delineation of abdominal anatomy, particularly on T1- weighted sequences.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.