American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 157, 799-806, Copyright © 1991 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Osteoarthritis of the knee: comparison of radiography, CT, and MR imaging to assess extent and severity

WP Chan, P Lang, MP Stevens, K Sack, S Majumdar, DW Stoller, C Basch and HK Genant
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco 94143.

Although conventional radiography is the method most frequently used for monitoring progression of osteoarthritis, it may not show osteoarthritic changes of the knee until late in the disease, and it may show involvement of only one or two compartments in patients who have tricompartmental disease. We compared radiography, CT, and MR imaging for assessing the extent and severity of osteoarthritis of the knee in 20 patients. Radiography included posteroanterior weight- bearing, true lateral, and sunrise patellar projections. Axial CT scans were reformatted in sagittal and coronal planes. MR imaging consisted of spin-echo (600-800/20; 2000/60, 120 [TR/TE]), and gradient-echo (600/30, theta = 30 degrees) sequences. The severity of osteoarthritic changes was graded from 0 to 3. MR frequently showed tricompartmental cartilage loss when radiography and CT showed only bicompartmental involvement in the medial and patellofemoral compartments. In the lateral compartment, MR showed a higher prevalence of cartilage loss (60%) than radiography (35%) and CT (25%) did. In the medial compartment, CT and MR showed osteophytes in 100% of the knees, whereas radiography showed osteophytes in only 60%. Notably, radiography often failed to show osteophytes in the posterior medial femoral condyle. On MR images, meniscal degeneration or tears were found in all 20 knees studied. Partial and complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament were found in three and seven patients, respectively. MR is more sensitive than radiography and CT for assessing the extent and severity of osteoarthritic changes and frequently shows tricompartmental disease in patients in whom radiography and CT show only bicompartmental involvement. MR imaging is unique for evaluating meniscal and ligamentous disease related to osteoarthritis.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. C. Duncan, E. M. Hay, J. Saklatvala, and P. R. Croft Prevalence of radiographic osteoarthritis--it all depends on your point of view Rheumatology, June 1, 2006; 45(6): 757 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. W. Hayes, D. A. Jamadar, G. W. Welch, M. L. Jannausch, L. L. Lachance, D. C. Capul, and M. R. Sowers Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Comparison of MR Imaging Findings with Radiographic Severity Measurements and Pain in Middle-aged Women Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 998 - 1007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Y. El-Khoury, K. J. Alliman, H. J. Lundberg, M. J. Rudert, T. D. Brown, and C. L. Saltzman Cartilage Thickness in Cadaveric Ankles: Measurement with Double-Contrast Multi-Detector Row CT Arthrography versus MR Imaging Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 768 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Tehranzadeh, O. Ashikyan, J. Dascalos, and C. Dennehey MRI of Large Intraosseous Lesions in Patients with Inflammatory Arthritis Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1453 - 1463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H A Alhadlaq, Y Xia, J B Moody, and J R Matyas Detecting structural changes in early experimental osteoarthritis of tibial cartilage by microscopic magnetic resonance imaging and polarised light microscopy Ann Rheum Dis, June 1, 2004; 63(6): 709 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				L. D. Bennett and J. C. Buckland-Wright Meniscal and articular cartilage changes in knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional double-contrast macroradiographic study Rheumatology, August 1, 2002; 41(8): 917 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Muellner, A. Egkher, A. Nikolic, M. Funovics, and V. Metz Open Meniscal Repair: Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings After Twelve Years Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1999; 27(1): 16 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]