AJR AJR Integrative Imaging Dec 2008 articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Debatin, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Sostman, H. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Debatin, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Sostman, H. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 157, 981-990, Copyright © 1991 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Imaging of the renal arteries: value of MR angiography

JF Debatin, CE Spritzer, TM Grist, C Beam, LP Svetkey, GE Newman and HD Sostman
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

We compared the efficacy of MR angiography with that of conventional angiography for visualizing the renal arteries and detecting renovascular disease. Thirty-three MR angiographic studies, consisting of axial two-dimensional (2-D) phase-contrast, coronal 2-D phase- contrast, and coronal 2-D time-of-flight acquisitions, were performed within 48 hr of conventional arteriography. The studies were done to evaluate possible renovascular hypertension (n = 25) or potential donor nephrectomy (n = 8). The three MR image sets were interpreted independently, in random order by three observers, with regard to the number of renal arteries, degree of vessel visualization, arteriovenous overlap, and presence of renovascular disease. A fourth interpretation was based on the combined axial and coronal phase-contrast image sets. Evaluation was limited to the proximal 35 mm of each renal artery. Renal artery visualization and detection of renovascular disease were more complete with coronal phase-contrast (80% sensitivity, 91% specificity) than with time-of-flight (53% sensitivity, 97% specificity) images. Combined axial and coronal phase-contrast images permitted visualization of the proximal 35 mm of all dominant renal arteries and detection of 13 of 15 stenoses (87% sensitivity, 97% specificity). Our data suggest that biplanar MR angiography has considerable potential as a noninvasive screening technique for the evaluation of renovascular disease.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
G. M. Soares, T. P. Murphy, M. S. Singha, A. Parada, and M. Jaff
Renal artery duplex ultrasonography as a screening and surveillance tool to detect renal artery stenosis: a comparison with current reference standard imaging.
J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2006; 25(3): 293 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
National High Blood Pressure Education Program Wor
The Fourth Report on the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents
Pediatrics, August 1, 2004; 114(2/S2): 555 - 576.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. W. de Haan, J. M.A. van Engelshoven, A. J.H.M. Houben, D. W. Kaandorp, A. G.H. Kessels, A. A. Kroon, and P. W. de Leeuw
Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Flow Quantification in Renal Arteries: Comparison With 133Xenon Washout Measurements
Hypertension, January 1, 2003; 41(1): 114 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. De Cobelli, M. Venturini, A. Vanzulli, S. Sironi, M. Salvioni, E. Angeli, P. Scifo, M. P. Garancini, R. Quartagno, G. Bianchi, et al.
Renal Arterial Stenosis: Prospective Comparison of Color Doppler US and Breath-hold, Three-dimensional, Dynamic, Gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography
Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 373 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Y. Watanabe, M. Dohke, A. Okumura, Y. Amoh, T. Ishimori, K. Oda, T. Hayashi, A. Hiyama, and Y. Dodo
Dynamic Subtraction Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography: Technique, Clinical Applications, and Pitfalls
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2000; 20(1): 135 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
B. A. Urban and E. K. Fishman
Renal Lymphoma: CT Patterns with Emphasis on Helical CT
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2000; 20(1): 197 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. K. Yucel, C. M. Anderson, R. R. Edelman, T. M. Grist, R. A. Baum, W. J. Manning, A. Culebras, and W. Pearce
Magnetic Resonance Angiography : Update on Applications for Extracranial Arteries
Circulation, November 30, 1999; 100(22): 2284 - 2301.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Q. Dong, S. O. Schoenberg, R. C. Carlos, M. Neimatallah, K. J. Cho, D. M. Williams, S. N. Kazanjian, and M. R. Prince
Diagnosis of Renal Vascular Disease with MR Angiography
RadioGraphics, November 1, 1999; 19(6): 1535 - 1554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
R. C. Carlos, Q. Dong, J. C. Stanley, and M. R. Prince
MR Angiography after Renal Revascularization: Spectrum of Expected Anatomic Results and Postintervention Complications
RadioGraphics, November 1, 1999; 19(6): 1555 - 1568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
P. Carmichael and A. R Carmichael
Current concepts: Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: from diagnosis to treatment
Postgrad. Med. J., September 1, 1999; 75(887): 527 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
D. A. Leung, U. Hoffmann, T. Pfammatter, T. F. Hany, L. Rainoni, P. Hilfiker, E. Schneider, G. G. Zimmermann-Paul, and J. F. Debatin
Magnetic Resonance Angiography Versus Duplex Sonography for Diagnosing Renovascular Disease
Hypertension, February 1, 1999; 33(2): 726 - 731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.