AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benson, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Doubilet, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Benson, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Doubilet, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 157, 1275-1277, Copyright © 1991 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Sonographic prediction of gestational age: accuracy of second- and third-trimester fetal measurements

CB Benson and PM Doubilet
Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.

We measured the accuracy of second- and third-trimester sonographic predictors of gestational age against highly reliable gold standard (crown-rump length) in a group of fetuses. Using a prospectively collected computerized data base, we selected 460 fetal sonograms obtained at 14-42 weeks of gestation in which age could be reliably established on the basis of crown-rump length in the first trimester. We used data obtained from these sonograms to compare several predictors of fetal age. The accuracy of all predictors worsened progressively as pregnancy proceeded. In the second trimester, corrected biparietal diameter and head circumference were more accurate predictors of gestational age than were biparietal diameter, femoral length, and abdominal circumference (p less than .05, F test). In the third trimester, the corrected biparietal diameter, head circumference, and femoral length were the best predictors, significantly better than biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference (p less than .05, F test). Prediction of gestational age that relies on a single sonographic measurement should be based on the head circumference or corrected biparietal diameter in the second trimester and on one of these two predictors or the femoral length in the third trimester.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.