AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 158, 95-99, Copyright © 1992 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

MR appearance of the normal and abnormal vagina after hysterectomy

JJ Brown, ED Gutierrez and JK Lee
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.

To define the MR appearance of the vagina after hysterectomy, we reviewed the MR examinations of 43 women who had undergone hysterectomy for a variety of benign and malignant indications. In eight of the patients, MR examinations showed a mass lesion involving the vagina. The masses included four recurrent primary gynecologic malignant neoplasms (one endometrial, one ovarian, and two cervical carcinomas) and four primary vaginal carcinomas. The remaining 35 patients had no evidence of vaginal disease. Of these 35 patients, the repaired vaginal apex, or vaginal cuff, was linear and smooth in appearance in 23 and partially obscured by surgical clip artifacts in seven. In the other five patients, the vaginal cuff had a nodular appearance that was indistinguishable from a vaginal mass on T1-weighted images. However, the vagina had a normal appearance in these patients on T2-weighted images, on which the low-signal-intensity layer of vaginal smooth muscle could be distinguished from the bright outer layer of connective tissue. In patients with recurrent vaginal tumors, the tumor was relatively high in signal intensity on T2-weighted images and obliterated the low-signal-intensity vaginal muscularis. Our experience shows that the normal posthysterectomy vagina may have a nodular appearance on T1-weighted images mimicking a vaginal mass. This appearance can be distinguished from that of a true vaginal mass on the basis of different signal intensity characteristics on T2-weighted images.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Y. Y. Jeong, H. K. Kang, T. W. Chung, J. J. Seo, and J. G. Park
Uterine Cervical Carcinoma after Therapy: CT and MR Imaging Findings
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2003; 23(4): 969 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. M. deSouza, O. J. Daniels, A. D. Williams, D. J. Gilderdale, and P. D. Abel
Female Urinary Genuine Stress Incontinence: Anatomic Considerations at MR Imaging of the Paravaginal Fascia and Urethra—Initial Observations
Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 433 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.