AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reuter, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Krolikowski, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reuter, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Krolikowski, F. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 158, 273-278, Copyright © 1992 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Risk factors for breast cancer in women undergoing mammography

KL Reuter, SP Baker and FJ Krolikowski
Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester 01655.

To determine risk factors for carcinoma of the breast, we compared women with cancer on screening and diagnostic mammography with those in whom cancer was not detected. For 39 months, medical histories were collected by mammography technologists on 3492 women having routine screenings or diagnostic mammograms at our institution. Potential risk factors of women with biopsy-proved breast cancer were compared with those in women who had normal findings on mammograms or negative biopsy results (control subjects). Of the 3492 women, 49 had biopsy-proved breast cancer. There were 3361 patients in the control group, including those women with normal findings on mammograms (3294) and those with negative biopsy results (67). Eighty-two women had incomplete questionnaires or were lost to follow up. Nearly all of the patients with breast cancer were postmenopausal compared with 68% of the control subjects. The mean length of lactation for breast cancer patients was significantly less than for control subjects: 5.6 vs 7.5 weeks (p = .015). This was true also for the postmenopausal patients: 8.1 vs 6.1 weeks (p = .041). Postmenopausal breast cancer patients had menstruated significantly more years (p = .016) than the postmenopausal control subjects: 34 vs 31 years, although the mean age at menarche was not different. When corrected for age, there was no significant difference in the total duration of menstruation in the postmenopausal cancer patients compared with the postmenopausal control subjects. Postmenopausal breast cancer patients had a significantly greater (p = .021) average body weight than postmenopausal control subjects: 71.7 vs 66.7 kg, although body weight was the same when all patients were considered. Similar results were found when Quetelet's index for obesity (weight in kg/height in cm2) (p = .004) was calculated for postmenopausal patients: 28 for cancer patients and 26 for control subjects. There was no significant difference in height between the cancer patients and control subjects when all patients or just the postmenopausal patients were considered. History of oral contraceptive use was significantly less common among postmenopausal breast cancer patients than among postmenopausal control subjects: 9% vs 20%. Patients with breast cancer had lower parity than the control subjects. In our series of patients, women in whom breast cancer was detected on mammography lactated less, showed no significant difference in years of menstruation when corrected for age, had a greater average body weight, used oral contraceptives less often, and had fewer children than women in whom no cancer was detected on mammography.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. R. Guest, M. A. Helvie, H.-P. Chan, L. M. Hadjiiski, J. E. Bailey, and M. A. Roubidoux
Adverse Effects of Increased Body Weight on Quantitative Measures of Mammographic Image Quality
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2000; 175(3): 805 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. A. Hunt and E. A. Sickles
Effect of Obesity on Screening Mammography: Outcomes Analysis of 88,346 Consecutive Examinations
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1251 - 1255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.