AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Lange, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Edge, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Lange, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Edge, S. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 158, 287-292, Copyright © 1992 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Rectal carcinoma treated by preoperative irradiation: MR imaging and histopathologic correlation

EE de Lange, RE Fechner, CA Spaulding and SB Edge
Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville 22908.

We evaluated the role of MR imaging in assessing the effect of preoperative irradiation in 11 patients with primary rectal carcinoma. Findings on MR images obtained before radiotherapy and 5-6 weeks afterward were analyzed and correlated with the histopathological findings (nine patients) or the findings at laparotomy (two patients). Before irradiation, the tumor volumes on MR images were between 3.3 and 51.7 cm3 (mean 19.7 cm3). After irradiation, the volumes were from 0.8 to 33.2 cm3 (mean, 10.4 cm3), representing a decrease in volume of 11% to 88% (mean, 55%). On the MR images obtained before irradiation, the tumors were confined to the bowel wall in four cases (stage A-B1), penetrated the perirectal fat in six cases (stage B2), and involved an adjacent organ in one case (stage B3). After irradiation, no apparent changes were seen in the MR appearance of the local tumor stage in nine of the 11 patients. In one patient, progression of stage was suspected on the postirradiation MR images, but this was not confirmed at histologic examination. In one patient, possible downstaging occurred after irradiation, although this could not be proved. Our findings suggest that MR imaging may be useful for determining the effect of preoperative radiotherapy on rectal carcinomas.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C MESSIOU, A G CHALMERS, K BOYLE, D WILSON, and P SAGAR
Pre-operative MR assessment of recurrent rectal cancer
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2008; 81(966): 468 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. B. Kruskal, S. M. Sentovich, and R. A. Kane
Staging of Rectal Cancer after Polypectomy: Usefulness of Endorectal US
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 31 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.