American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 158, 339-345, Copyright © 1992 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

MR imaging of joints: analytic optimization of GRE techniques at 1.5 T

L Yao, S Sinha and LL Seeger
Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles 90024.

To clarify the choice of imaging parameters for optimal gradient- recalled echo MR scanning of joints, we analyzed the behavior of contrast-to-noise and signal-to-noise ratios for spoiled (i.e., fast low-angle shot [FLASH] or spoiled GRASS) and steady-state (i.e., gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state [GRASS] or fast imaging with steady precession) techniques at 1.5 T. The analysis is based on tissue characteristics derived from spin-echo measurements of hyaline cartilage and synovial fluid signal in the patellofemoral joints of 11 volunteers. Separate analysis of contrast-to-noise and signal-to-noise ratios for multiplanar (long TR) acquisitions shows that these parameters are each improved compared with single-slice methods. At TRs greater than 250 msec, there is no significant difference in the contrast behavior of FLASH and GRASS. For optimal contrast-to-noise ratio (synovial fluid-cartilage), the best multiplanar sequence (for TE less than 23 msec) is with a short TE and a large flip angle (e.g., 400/9/73 degrees [TR/TE/flip angle]). If a single-scan or three-dimensional technique is desired, than a GRASS sequence at minimal TR and TE and intermediate flip angle (18/9/32 degrees) is best. For optimal signal-to-noise ratio (for both synovial fluid and hyaline cartilage), the best multiplanar sequence uses a short TE and an intermediate flip angle (e.g., 400/9/30 degrees). If a short TR, high signal-to-noise technique is desired, then GRASS (18/9/13 degrees) is superior to FLASH.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. E. Gold, E. Han, J. Stainsby, G. Wright, J. Brittain, and C. Beaulieu Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: Relaxation Times and Image Contrast Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2004; 183(2): 343 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Duvvuri, S. R. Charagundla, S. B. Kudchodkar, J. H. Kaufman, J. B. Kneeland, R. Rizi, J. S. Leigh, and R. Reddy Human Knee: In Vivo T1{rho}-weighted MR Imaging at 1.5 T—Preliminary Experience Radiology, September 1, 2001; 220(3): 822 - 826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]