AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Nakagawa, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Nakagawa, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 158, 431-436, Copyright © 1992 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Comparison of the efficacy of digital subtraction and film-screen angiography of the lower limb: prospective study in 50 patients

TP Smith, AH Cragg, KS Berbaum and N Nakagawa
Department of Radiology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242.

We prospectively compared current digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with conventional film-screen angiography (FSA) of the lower limb for evaluation of areas of arterial stenosis and degree of arterial visualization. Fifty patients had both DSA and FSA of a single lower limb. Specific anatomic sites (examiner-selected sites) throughout the lower limb were marked on each film by an experienced angiographer (examiner). These sites consisted of the common femoral, superficial femoral, popliteal, anterior tibial, posterior tibial, peroneal, and dorsalis pedis arteries and bypass grafts, when present. The films were then reviewed blindly by two different experienced angiographers (observers). All sites were graded for the degree of arterial narrowing based on a standard scale (grade 1 = normal, grade 5 = occluded) that also included grading for nonvisualization (grade 6). Each observer also selected the most stenotic site in each anatomic area (observer- selected sites). The data were analyzed for the entire lower limb and at specific anatomic sites. DSA sites were judged to be slightly more narrowed (p less than .05) in the superficial femoral artery by both observers and in the common femoral artery, bypass graft, and overall by a single observer. No other significant differences were found in grade of stenosis or vessel visualization for examiner-selected sites. For observer-selected sites, observers agreed on the location of the most stenotic site 76% of the time for FSA and 69% of the time for DSA. No significant difference was found in grade of stenosis or vessel visualization for either observer for the entire lower limb or at specific anatomic sites. These findings were present when all sites chosen were considered and when there was agreement between sites chosen on FSA and DSA for each observer. In conclusion, optimal-quality FSA and DSA produced virtually equivalent results for angiography of the lower limb for both grade of stenosis/occlusion and vessel visualization.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
H.-P. Ledermann, A.-C. Schulte, H.-G. Heidecker, M. Aschwanden, K. A. Jager, K. Scheffler, W. Steinbrich, and D. Bilecen
Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Skeletal Muscle in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease
Circulation, June 27, 2006; 113(25): 2929 - 2935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Fenchel, A. M. Scheule, N. I. Stauder, U. Kramer, K. Tomaschko, T. Nagele, C. Bretschneider, H.-P. Schlemmer, C. D. Claussen, and S. Miller
Atherosclerotic Disease: Whole-Body Cardiovascular Imaging with MR System with 32 Receiver Channels and Total-Body Surface Coil Technology--Initial Clinical Results
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 238(1): 280 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. F. M. Meaney, J. P. Ridgway, S. Chakraverty, I. Robertson, D. Kessel, A. Radjenovic, M. Kouwenhoven, A. Kassner, and M. A. Smith
Stepping-Table Gadolinium- enhanced Digital Subtraction MR Angiography of the Aorta and Lower Extremity Arteries: Preliminary Experience
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 59 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.