AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fraser-Hill, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Renfrew, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fraser-Hill, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Renfrew, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 158, 809-812, Copyright © 1992 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Percutaneous needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions. 1. Effective accuracy and diagnostic utility

MA Fraser-Hill and DL Renfrew
Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.

The utility of a diagnostic test depends not only on its accuracy but also on how its results affect clinical management. We reviewed the results of 102 percutaneous needle biopsies to determine the accuracy, effective accuracy, and diagnostic utility of the procedure. We found percutaneous needle biopsy was similarly accurate in identifying suspected metastatic lesions (82%, n = 44), suspected musculoskeletal infections (90%, n = 29), and suspected primary musculoskeletal tumors (83%, n = 29). Effective accuracy, or accuracy discounted for results with limited clinical utility, was highest in identifying suspected metastatic deposits (77%), slightly lower in suspected infections (72%), and lowest in suspected primary tumors (59%). Diagnostic utility (the probability-weighted sum of the utility values of all possible outcomes of a diagnostic test) for identifying metastatic deposits and infections exceeded that for suspected primary tumors. Percutaneous needle biopsy in patients with suspected primary tumors must be performed with the knowledge that, even though technically accurate, such biopsies may be of limited clinical value. Percutaneous needle biopsy of suspected metastatic lesions and suspected infections, on the other hand, offers high accuracy and high diagnostic utility.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. Gangi, S. Guth, J.-L. Dietemann, and C. Roy
Interventional Musculoskeletal Procedures
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2001; 21(2): e1 - e1.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Yao, S. D. Nelson, L. L. Seeger, J. J. Eckardt, and F. R. Eilber
Primary Musculoskeletal Neoplasms: Effectiveness of Core-Needle Biopsy
Radiology, September 1, 1999; 212(3): 682 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.