AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marti-Bonmati, L.
Right arrow Articles by Cortina, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marti-Bonmati, L.
Right arrow Articles by Cortina, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 158, 867-871, Copyright © 1992 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Diagnosis of Sturge-Weber syndrome: comparison of the efficacy of CT and MR imaging in 14 cases

L Marti-Bonmati, F Menor, C Poyatos and H Cortina
Unidad de Resonancia Magnetica, Departamento de Diagnostico por la Imagen, Valencia, Spain.

Sturge-Weber syndrome is a neurocutaneous syndrome that includes facial and leptomeningeal angiomas. Imaging findings include cerebral lobar atrophy, brain calcifications, choroid plexus enlargement, cranial diploe prominence, and venous abnormalities. We compared the efficacy of CT and MR imaging in making the diagnosis in 14 consecutive patients. CT, with and without contrast enhancement, was performed in all patients, and 11 of the 14 had MR imaging (eight before and after administration of IV gadopentetate dimeglumine). MR imaging was better than CT in showing the extent and degree of brain parenchymal atrophy, the presumed ischemic changes affecting the gray and white matter, and the cranial diploetic prominence on the affected side. MR imaging after contrast administration permitted a better evaluation of the extent and patency of the leptomeningeal angiomatous malformation and the parenchymal venous anomalies. CT was better than MR imaging in showing the presence and extent of cortical calcifications. Enhanced CT and MR imaging were equal in evaluating the prominence of the ipsilateral choroid plexus. Our experience indicates that contrast-enhanced MR imaging is the method of choice in the diagnosis of Sturge-Weber syndrome. Unenhanced CT should be used only if MR findings are normal, to exclude the presence of intracranial calcifications.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
T. M. Kelley, L. A. Hatfield, D. D. M. Lin, and A. M. Comi
Quantitative Analysis of Cerebral Cortical Atrophy and Correlation With Clinical Severity in Unilateral Sturge-Weber Syndrome
J Child Neurol, November 1, 2005; 20(11): 867 - 870.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
A. M. Comi, C. J. C. Weisz, B. H. Highet, R. L. Skolasky, C. A. Pardo, and E. J. Hess
Sturge-Weber Syndrome: Altered Blood Vessel Fibronectin Expression and Morphology
J Child Neurol, July 1, 2005; 20(7): 572 - 577.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. C. Vilanova, J. Barcelo, J. G. Smirniotopoulos, R. Perez-Andres, M. Villalon, J. Miro, F. Martin, J. Capellades, and P. R. Ros
Hemangioma from Head to Toe: MR Imaging with Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2004; 24(2): 367 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
F Pinton, C Chiron, O Enjolras, J Motte, A Syrota, and O Dulac
Early single photon emission computed tomography in Sturge-Weber syndrome
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, November 1, 1997; 63(5): 616 - 621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.