AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hricak, H.
Right arrow Articles by Goranson, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hricak, H.
Right arrow Articles by Goranson, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 158, 1043-1050, Copyright © 1992 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

MR imaging in the evaluation of benign uterine masses: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced T1-weighted images

H Hricak, S Finck, G Honda and H Goranson
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco 94143- 0628.

Forty-six patients with surgically proved disease (115 leiomyomas, 19 cases of adenomyosis, and 14 endometrial polyps) were studied to determine if gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced T1-weighted MR images improve the detection and characterization of benign tumors of the uterus. Lesion detection and characterization were assessed separately for each sequence (unenhanced T1-weighted, proton-density-weighted, and T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images) and for combinations of sequences (unenhanced T1- and T2-weighted images, unenhanced and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images, and unenhanced T1- and T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images). In the evaluation of leiomyomas, analysis of all three sequences provided the best detection (92%) and characterization (92%), but the improvement, except when compared with unenhanced T1-weighted images alone, was not statistically significant. The use of contrast medium did not contribute to either tumor detection or characterization. In the evaluation of adenomyosis, T2-weighted images provided significantly better lesion detection and characterization than did either unenhanced or contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. In the evaluation of endometrial polyps, however, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images provided significantly better lesion detection and characterization than did unenhanced images. With contrast-enhanced images, the detection rate was 79%, compared with 36% for T2-weighted images and 7% for T1-weighted images. Lesion characterization was the best (73%) when all imaging sequences were analyzed. Our study shows that with conventional spin-echo sequences, the use of contrast-enhanced T1- weighted images does not improve the detection or characterization of uterine leiomyomas or adenomyosis but significantly improves the detection of endometrial polyps.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Bazot, A. Cortez, E. Darai, J. Rouger, J. Chopier, J.-M. Antoine, and S. Uzan
Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2427 - 2433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. M. Ascher, I. Imaoka, and J. M. Lage
Tamoxifen-induced Uterine Abnormalities: The Role of Imaging1
Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 29 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. P. Grasel, E. K. Outwater, E. S. Siegelman, D. Capuzzi, L. Parker, and S. M. Hussain
Endometrial Polyps: MR Imaging Features and Distinction from Endometrial Carcinoma1
Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 47 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. Reinhold, F. Tafazoli, A. Mehio, L. Wang, M. Atri, E. S. Siegelman, and L. Rohoman
Uterine Adenomyosis: Endovaginal US and MR Imaging Features with Histopathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, October 1, 1999; 19(90001): 147 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. Murase, E. S. Siegelman, E. K. Outwater, L. A. Perez-Jaffe, and R. W. Tureck
Uterine Leiomyomas: Histopathologic Features, MR Imaging Findings, Differential Diagnosis, and Treatment
RadioGraphics, September 1, 1999; 19(5): 1179 - 1197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.