AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sivit, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kushner, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sivit, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kushner, D. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 158, 1097-1100, Copyright © 1992 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Blunt pancreatic trauma in children: CT diagnosis

CJ Sivit, MR Eichelberger, GA Taylor, DI Bulas, CS Gotschall and DC Kushner
Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiology, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC 20010.

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of CT in the diagnosis of pancreatic injury after blunt abdominal trauma in children. Pancreatic injury was diagnosed at surgery, at autopsy, or on the basis of the development of clinical pancreatitis or a pseudocyst on follow-up imaging evaluation in 18 of 1045 consecutive children examined with CT after blunt trauma. Types of pancreatic injury included laceration in 11 children, transection in two, contusion in one, and tumor with hemorrhage in one. Three children had clinical pancreatitis without a pancreatic abnormality noted on CT. The pancreatic injury was prospectively identified on CT in 12 children (67%). The presence of fluid in the lesser sac was a useful marker for injury to the pancreas. This was noted in 13 children with pancreatic injury, whereas it was observed in only six (1%) of 1028 children in the absence of pancreatic injury (sensitivity, 72%; specificity, 99%). Fluid in the anterior pararenal space was less helpful in establishing the diagnosis of pancreatic injury (sensitivity, 44%; specificity, 98%). A pancreatic pseudocyst developed in four of the 11 survivors. Our experience shows that direct signs of pancreatic trauma may be difficult to identify on CT. Recognition of the limitations of CT diagnosis of pancreatic injury is important in helping to reduce errors of interpretation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. A. Novelline, J. T. Rhea, P. M. Rao, and J. L. Stuk
Helical CT in Emergency Radiology
Radiology, November 1, 1999; 213(2): 321 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.