American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 158, 1135-1144, Copyright © 1992 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis in adults: a metaanalysis of the accuracy of CT, MR, and myelography

DL Kent, DR Haynor, EB Larson and RA Deyo
Health Services Research and Development Service, VA Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98108.

We undertook a literature synthesis of CT, MR, and myelographic studies to evaluate what is known about the diagnostic accuracy of these imaging tests for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis in adults without prior surgery. From 116 possibly relevant studies, we reviewed 14 articles that included cases of spinal stenosis with a reference standard other than the imaging tests of interest. Of the studies we reviewed, two involved only MR, nine only CT, and three used both; six studies included myelography. Rating categories of A, B, C, or D were assigned for the quality of research methods used to estimate diagnostic accuracy. All studies received either a C or D rating. Common methodologic problems were failure to assemble a representative cohort for study, small sample size, and failure to maintain independence between image readings and reference standards. Sensitivity ranged from 0.81 to 0.97 for MR, from 0.70 to 1.0 for CT, and from 0.67 to 0.78 myelography. Studies varied greatly in case selection, definition of test and disease categories, and geographic locale, so no pooled estimates could be derived. In asymptomatic patients, abnormal findings appeared on CT or MR in 4-28% of cases and were more common in the elderly. Published studies of the value of CT and MR for the diagnosis of lumbar stenosis lack methodologic rigor and do not permit strong conclusions about the relative diagnostic accuracies of these procedures. For the present, the choice between MR or CT depends on issues such as costs, reimbursements, access to equipment, skill of radiologists, and patient safety. Better studies will be needed to document claims for improvements in imaging accuracy as MR technologies evolve. These studies should emphasize larger sample sizes, more attention to research designs that avoid methodologic biases, and the contribution of imaging diagnoses to ultimate clinical outcome.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. N. Katz and M. B. Harris Lumbar Spinal Stenosis N. Engl. J. Med., February 21, 2008; 358(8): 818 - 825. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Terasawa, T. Nihashi, T. Hotta, and H. Nagai 18F-FDG PET for Posttherapy Assessment of Hodgkin's Disease and Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Systematic Review J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 13 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W.G. Bradley Jr. and for the Expert Panel on Neurologic Imaging Low Back Pain AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2007; 28(5): 990 - 992. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Haig, M. E. Geisser, H. C. Tong, K. S.J. Yamakawa, D. J. Quint, J. T. Hoff, A. Chiodo, J. A. Miner, and V. V. Phalke Electromyographic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Predict Lumbar Stenosis, Low-Back Pain, and No Back Symptoms J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2007; 89(2): 358 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J-E C Holty, W G Kuschner, and M K Gould Accuracy of transbronchial needle aspiration for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis Thorax, November 1, 2005; 60(11): 949 - 955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. K. Gould, W. G. Kuschner, C. E. Rydzak, C. C. Maclean, A. N. Demas, H. Shigemitsu, J. K. Chan, and D. K. Owens Test Performance of Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography for Mediastinal Staging in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Ann Intern Med, December 2, 2003; 139(11): 879 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. K. Gould, G. D. Sanders, P. G. Barnett, C. E. Rydzak, C. C. Maclean, M. B. McClellan, and D. K. Owens Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Management Strategies for Patients with Solitary Pulmonary Nodules Ann Intern Med, May 6, 2003; 138(9): 724 - 735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Jarvik and R. A. Deyo Diagnostic Evaluation of Low Back Pain with Emphasis on Imaging Ann Intern Med, October 1, 2002; 137(7): 586 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. K. Gould, C. C. Maclean, W. G. Kuschner, C. E. Rydzak, and D. K. Owens Accuracy of Positron Emission Tomography for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Nodules and Mass Lesions: A Meta-analysis JAMA, February 21, 2001; 285(7): 914 - 924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Rees, V. Lo Re, T. Barton, S. Feiner, P. Hari, A. Joshi, G. K. P. Chemiti, Jon. D. Lurie, P. D. Gerber, and H. C. Sox A Pain in the Back N. Engl. J. Med., February 8, 2001; 344(6): 456 - 457. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Lurie, P. D. Gerber, and H. C. Sox A Pain in the Back N. Engl. J. Med., September 7, 2000; 343(10): 723 - 726. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Visser and M. G. Myriam Hunink Peripheral Arterial Disease: Gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography versus Color-guided Duplex US-A Meta-analysis Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 67 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				B. A. Dwamena, S. S. Sonnad, J. O. Angobaldo, and R. L. Wahl Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Mediastinal Staging in the 1990s-Meta-analytic Comparison Of PET and CT Radiology, November 1, 1999; 213(2): 530 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. Breslau, J. G. Jarvik, D. R. Haynor, W. T. Longstreth Jr, D. L. Kent, and K. R. Maravilla MR Contrast Media in Neuroimaging: A Critical Review of the Literature AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 1999; 20(4): 670 - 675. [Abstract] [Full Text]