AJR Custom publishing of AJR articles and ARRS Cat. Course
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolk, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wolk, R. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 158, 1243-1245, Copyright © 1992 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Hidden costs of mobile mammography: is subsidization necessary?

RB Wolk
Department of Radiology, Metro-West Medical Center, Natick, MA 01760.

Two major impediments to an effective mammography program are inaccessibility and cost. This article itemizes the expenses associated with providing a mobile screening program accredited by the American College of Radiology (ACR) during a 3-year period. Mobile Diagnostics Inc. established a mobile mammography service in April 1987. A 36-ft (11-m) van is staffed by two registered technologists. The unit includes on-board processing and educational videotapes. Analysis of expenses for the years 1988, 1989, and 1990 does not include interpretation fees. A total of 3522 patients were examined in 1988, 4232 in 1989, and 5005 in 1990. Fixed operating expenses in 1988 were $70/examination and variable expenses were $13/examination, resulting in an average total cost per examination of $83. Fixed costs in 1989 were $63, variable costs were $15, and total costs were $78 per examination. Fixed costs in 1990 were $55, variable costs were $14, and total costs were $69 per examination. Many third parties, including Medicare, are contemplating a global screening fee in the $50-$60 range. An average payment of $55 would require examination of more than 6500 patients a year or 28 patients a day to break even. Our experience suggests that some form of subsidization may be necessary to sustain a mobile mammography service at those reimbursement levels.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. P. Poplack, P. A. Carney, J. E. Weiss, L. Titus-Ernstoff, M. E. Goodrich, and A. N. A. Tosteson
Screening Mammography: Costs and Use of Screening-related Services
Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 79 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.