AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, G. L., 3d
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 159, 131-135, Copyright © 1992 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Occult glove perforations: frequency during interventional radiologic procedures

ME Hansen, DD McIntire and GL Miller 3d
Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, 75235-9071.

Because the intact surgical glove is an important barrier against exposure to blood and other body fluids, occult glove perforations occurring during procedures may have implications for infection control and protection of health care workers. Although the frequency of occult glove perforations during surgery has been studied, no such data have been reported for interventional radiology. This study was designed to determine the frequency of occult glove perforations in interventional radiology. Gloves used during interventional radiologic procedures were collected and tested for occult perforations according to previously accepted methods. The frequency of occult defects in unused gloves was also determined. A form completed for each pair of gloves indicated length of use, awareness of perforations, and information about the procedure. The anatomic distribution of perforations was also studied. Occult perforations were found in 49 (10%) of 492 used gloves. The frequency of defects in unused gloves was 1% (2/160). Gloves worn fewer than 2 hr had a perforation rate of 7% (29/406), and those worn 2 hr or longer had a rate of 23% (20/86; p less than .0001). Perforations were noticed by the wearer in only three (6%) of the 49 perforations. The perforation rate for inner gloves of a double-glove set was 3% (1/34; the corresponding outer glove also was perforated). Although the 10% rate of occult glove perforation during interventional radiologic procedures found in this series is lower than rates described with surgical procedures, it is not insignificant. The significant increase in the rate of perforation when gloves are worn more than 2 hr suggests that gloves should routinely be changed at or before 2 hr of wear, particularly in procedures involving high-risk patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
Y. Kojima and M. Ohashi
Unnoticed Glove Perforation During Thoracoscopic and Open Thoracic Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 1078 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.