AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Applegate, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Applegate, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Applegate, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Applegate, L. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 159, 369-374, Copyright © 1992 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

MR angiography of the head and neck: value of two-dimensional phase- contrast projection technique

GR Applegate, SL Talagala and LJ Applegate
Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA 15213.

MR angiography is commonly performed by using two- and three- dimensional time-of-flight and three-dimensional phase-contrast techniques. These procedures require long examination times and processing of imaging data by computing maximum intensity projections. Two-dimensional phase-contrast projection angiography has neither of these disadvantages. We analyzed the value of this technique for head and neck MR angiography in 84 patients and 15 control subjects. Patients were examined to resolve specific clinical questions such as the presence of arteriovenous malformations (20 cases), patency of carotid and vertebral arteries (35 cases), patency of the superior sagittal sinus (14 cases), patency of saphenous vein bypass grafts (11 cases), and vascularity of masses (four cases). Conventional angiograms were available for correlation in 22 patients. Two-dimensional phase- contrast projection angiograms were generated by using a gradient- recalled-echo sequence sensitized to flow with the use of flow-encoding gradients. Projection MR angiograms were obtained in approximately 3.5 min by combining images obtained with flow-encoding gradients applied along the axes defining the image plane. MR angiograms were subjectively evaluated by three observers without reference to routine MR images or conventional angiograms. High-quality studies were obtained in 93% of control subjects and 90% of patients examined. The findings based on phase-contrast angiography were confirmed with conventional angiography in 21 of 22 patients for whom conventional angiograms were available. Evaluation of vascular grafts and of the patency of major cranial vessels was easily done with two-dimensional phase-contrast angiography and was useful in postoperative follow-up examinations. We also advocate its use for superior sagittal sinus thrombosis and follow-up examinations in patients with arteriovenous malformations.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.