AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stomper, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stomper, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, J. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 159, 483-485, Copyright © 1992 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic calcification and tumor subtype

PC Stomper and JL Connolly
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Ma. 02115.

OBJECTIVE. Histologic subtypes of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast have been correlated with disease progression after local excision only. This study was undertaken to determine how the predominant type of calcification seen on mammography correlates with the predominant histologic tumor subtype, knowledge that could aid in the development of clinical criteria for selecting patients for appropriate local treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A prospective double-blind study was performed to correlate the mammographic and histologic findings in 66 consecutive cases of ductal carcinoma in situ, or ductal carcinoma in situ associated with small invasive foci (n = 11), in which microcalcifications seen on mammograms were found in the ductal carcinoma during histologic evaluation of excisional biopsy specimens. Microcalcifications were categorized as predominantly linear or granular and were correlated with the predominant histologic subtype of ductal carcinoma in situ in the tissue containing the calcifications seen on mammograms. RESULTS. Predominantly linear calcifications were present in 47% (18/38) of ductal comedocarcinomas in situ compared with 18% (5/28) of cribriform, solid, or papillary subtypes (p = .01). Predominantly granular calcifications were present in 53% (20/38) of comedocarcinomas compared with 82% (23/28) of the noncomedo types (p = .01). In 94% (16/17) of cribriform ductal carcinomas in situ, granular microcalcifications were seen on mammograms. Seventy-eight percent (18/23) of linear calcifications in ductal carcinoma in situ were associated with the comedo subtype, whereas 53% (23/43) of the granular calcifications were associated with noncomedo subtypes. CONCLUSION. We conclude that the comedo subtype of ductal carcinoma in situ is more likely to be accompanied by linear calcifications than are the noncomedo subtypes, and noncomedo ductal carcinoma in situ is more likely to be associated with granular calcifications than is the comedo subtype when microcalcifications are seen on mammograms. However, there is considerable overlap, and the predominant histologic subtype cannot be predicted on the basis of the microcalcification type with a high degree of accuracy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. A. de Roos, B. van der Vegt, J. de Vries, J. Wesseling, and G. H. de Bock
Pathological and Biological Differences Between Screen-Detected and Interval Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast
Ann. Surg. Oncol., July 1, 2007; 14(7): 2097 - 2104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
H. J. Burstein, K. Polyak, J. S. Wong, S. C. Lester, and C. M. Kaelin
Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast
N. Engl. J. Med., April 1, 2004; 350(14): 1430 - 1441.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. C. Stomper, J. Geradts, S. B. Edge, and E. G. Levine
Mammographic Predictors of the Presence and Size of Invasive Carcinomas Associated With Malignant Microcalcification Lesions Without a Mass
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2003; 181(6): 1679 - 1684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S-C Chen, Y-C Cheung, Y-F Lo, M-F Chen, T-L Hwang, C-H Su, and S Hsueh
Sonographic differentiation of invasive and intraductal carcinomas of the breast
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2003; 76(909): 600 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. K. Gill, O. B. Ioffe, and W. A. Berg
When Is a Diagnosis of Sclerosing Adenosis Acceptable at Core Biopsy?
Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 50 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
E. S. Hwang, K. Kinkel, L. J. Esserman, Y. Lu, N. Weidner, and N. M. Hylton
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients Diagnosed With Ductal Carcinoma-In-Situ: Value in the Diagnosis of Residual Disease, Occult Invasion, and Multicentricity
Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2003; 10(4): 381 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. A. Berg
Rationale for a Trial of Screening Breast Ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6666
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2003; 180(5): 1225 - 1228.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
M. Sato, T. Fukutomi, S. Akashi-Tanaka, K. Miyakawa, N. Yamamoto, and T. Hasegawa
Accuracy in Estimating Tumor Extension According to Mammographic Subtypes in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2002; 32(5): 157 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. H. Lee, D. Carter, L. E. Philpotts, M. E. Couce, L. J. Horvath, R. C. Lange, and I. Tocino
Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Diagnosed with Stereotactic Core Needle Biopsy: Can Invasion Be Predicted?
Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 466 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. T. Stucker, D. M. Ikeda, A.-R. Hartman, T. I. George, K. W. Nowels, S. L. Birdwell, D. Goffinet, and R. W. Carlson
New Bilateral Microcalcifications at Mammography in a Postlactational Woman: Case Report
Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 247 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. Fisher, J. Costantino, C. Redmond, E. Fisher, R. Margolese, N. Dimitrov, N. Wolmark, D. L. Wickerham, M. Deutsch, L. Ore, et al.
Lumpectomy Compared with Lumpectomy and Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Intraductal Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., June 3, 1993; 328(22): 1581 - 1586.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. A. Berg, C. L. Arnoldus, E. Teferra, and M. Bhargavan
Biopsy of Amorphous Breast Calcifications: Pathologic Outcome and Yield at Stereotactic Biopsy
Radiology, November 1, 2001; 221(2): 495 - 503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. T. Harris
Case 41: Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 770 - 773.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. G. Thurfjell, A. Lindgren, and E. Thurfjell
Nonpalpable Breast Cancer: Mammographic Appearance as Predictor of Histologic Type
Radiology, January 1, 2002; 222(1): 165 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.