AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gulliver, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pappas, T. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gulliver, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pappas, T. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 159, 503-507, Copyright © 1992 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of thin-section dynamic CT in determining resectability

DJ Gulliver, ME Baker, CA Cheng, WC Meyers and TN Pappas
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

OBJECTIVE. Several authorities advocate the use of preoperative angiography to determine the resectability of pancreatic and periampullary tumors, claiming that CT alone is not sufficiently accurate for this purpose. Our objective was to assess the value of CT in predicting surgical resectability in patients with malignant biliary obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We performed a retrospective analysis of 380 consecutive cases of malignant biliary obstruction spanning a 4-year period. Most patients (230) were treated nonoperatively. Sixty-seven patients had surgery, pathologic confirmation of malignancy, and preoperative CT scans available for review. The CT scans were assessed for surgical resectability of tumor by an interpreter who did not know the patient's history. RESULTS. Forty-two patients had pancreatic adenocarcinoma, six had ampullary carcinoma, seven had cholangiocarcinoma, and 12 had other malignant neoplasms. Of 47 patients with tumors thought to be unresectable on the basis of CT findings, 42 had tumors that were found to be unresectable at surgery (positive predictive value, 89%). Of 20 patients with tumors thought to be resectable, 16 had tumors that were surgically resectable (positive predictive value, 80%). CT did not show metastases to duodenal lymph nodes (n = 2), portal vein infiltration (n = 1), and small hepatic metastases (n = 1). Visualization of most of these at angiography would not be expected. The CT finding of infiltration of the periarterial fat around the celiac or superior mesenteric arteries was reliable for predicting surgical unresectability. Lymphadenopathy and infiltration of nonperivascular fat planes were less reliable predictors of unresectability. CONCLUSION. Although some findings on CT that suggest unresectability are less reliable than others, the accuracy of CT compares favorably with reports on the accuracy of angiography for assessing tumor resectability in cases of malignant biliary obstruction. The addition of angiography to the examination of patients with potentially resectable lesions is not justified when high- quality, thin-section dynamic CT has been performed.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
J. M. Slattery and D. V. Sahani
What Is the Current State-of-the-Art Imaging for Detection and Staging of Cholangiocarcinoma?
Oncologist, September 1, 2006; 11(8): 913 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
A Meining, H J Dittler, A Wolf, R Lorenz, V Schusdziarra, J-R Siewert, M Classen, H Hofler, and T Rosch
You get what you expect? A critical appraisal of imaging methodology in endosonographic cancer staging
Gut, May 1, 2002; 50(5): 599 - 603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
R. R. White, H. I. Hurwitz, M. A. Morse, C. Lee, M. S. Anscher, E. K. Paulson, M. R. Gottfried, J. Baillie, M. S. Branch, P. S. Jowell, et al.
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Localized Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas
Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2001; 8(10): 758 - 765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
R. E. Jimenez, A. L. Warshaw, D. W. Rattner, C. G. Willett, D. McGrath, and C. Fernandez-del Castillo
Impact of Laparoscopic Staging in the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer
Arch Surg, April 1, 2000; 135(4): 409 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. Saini
Imaging of the Hepatobiliary Tract
N. Engl. J. Med., June 26, 1997; 336(26): 1889 - 1894.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.