AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lugmayr, H.
Right arrow Articles by Pauer, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lugmayr, H.
Right arrow Articles by Pauer, W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 159, 1091-1094, Copyright © 1992 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Self-expanding metal stents for palliative treatment of malignant ureteral obstruction

H Lugmayr and W Pauer
Department of Radiology, General Hospital, Wels, Austria.

OBJECTIVE. We studied the immediate and long-term efficacy of the Wallstent device in the treatment of ureteral obstruction caused by malignant disease. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In 23 patients (30 ureters), self-expanding metal stents were implanted endoscopically (n = 23), percutaneously (n = 5), or bidirectionally (n = 2) because of extrinsic malignant ureteral obstruction. Patients who met the following criteria were selected for stent implantation: (1) life expectancy of at least 6 months, (2) current polychemotherapy, (3) increasing levels of serum creatinine, and (4) severe clinical signs and symptoms associated with hydronephrosis. Obstruction was diagnosed by using sonography and excretory urography. After radiologic localization and dilatation of the stenosis, the Wallstent device was inserted. For 4 weeks, a double- J catheter inserted through the stent was kept in place in order to prevent obstruction by reversible hyperplastic reaction of the urothelium. Patients were followed up for 31 weeks (range, 3-75 weeks). Follow-up included sonography, excretory urography, and determination of serum levels of creatinine in all cases and furosemide scintigraphy and the Whitaker test in selected cases. RESULTS: Implantation of the Wallstent device was successful in 30 (97%) of 31 cases attempted. The survival rate was 81% after 6 months and 61% after 8 months. The primary patency was 83% after 30 weeks. Complications were macrohematuria (one patient) and incrustation (two patients). No infection and no migration or compression of the stent were observed. CONCLUSION. Implantation of a Wallstent device is a safe and effective alternative to double-J catheter placement in tumor-associated ureteral obstruction.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.