AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, D. F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 159, 1095-1097, Copyright © 1992 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Needle-tip localization during CT-guided abdominal biopsy: comparison of conventional and spiral CT

SG Silverman, DA Bloom, SE Seltzer, CM Tempany and DF Adams
Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.

OBJECTIVE. This study was performed to determine whether the time required for needle-tip localization during biopsy of the abdomen would be reduced if continuous-volume data acquisition, also known as spiral CT, were used for guidance instead of conventional CT. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Forty patients had biopsies of an abdominal mass; half underwent needle-tip localizations with conventional CT and half with spiral CT. The times required to localize the needle for 104 needle passes were calculated; scanning and reconstruction times were included, and the radiologist's technique and procedural difficulties were deliberately excluded. The mean needle localization times with conventional and spiral CT were compared for the upper abdominal and pelvic regions by using the two-tailed unpaired Student's t-test. RESULTS. The mean time (+/- SE) for spiral CT was 35 +/- 2 sec compared with 105 +/- 18 sec for conventional CT (p < .001). When analyzed by region, times with spiral CT were shorter in both the upper abdomen (means, 37 sec for spiral CT vs 150 sec for conventional CT, p < .001) and pelvis (means, 25 sec for spiral CT vs 74 sec for conventional CT, p = .038); the magnitude of the improvement was greater in the upper abdomen. CONCLUSION. The time required to find the needle tip during guided biopsy of an abdominal mass is reduced with spiral CT compared with conventional CT. This improvement is partly a result of the ability to eliminate respiratory misregistration with spiral CT, which is not possible with conventional multisectional CT; hence the greater advantage in upper abdominal biopsy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 RadiologyHome page
S. G. Silverman, K. Tuncali, D. F. Adams, R. D. Nawfel, K. H. Zou, and P. F. Judy
CT Fluoroscopy-guided Abdominal Interventions: Techniques, Results, and Radiation Exposure
Radiology, September 1, 1999; 212(3): 673 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.