AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thurnher, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thurnher, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 159, 1243-1250, Copyright © 1992 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

MR imaging of pelvic masses in women: contrast-enhanced vs unenhanced images

SA Thurnher
Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

OBJECTIVE. We compared the value of contrast-enhanced MR images with that of T2-weighted MR images in the diagnosis and staging of pelvic masses in women. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The findings on preoperative MR studies of 97 patients with a total of 124 surgically proved lesions were retrospectively analyzed. Unenhanced T1- and T2-weighted spin-echo images were compared with contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. The final diagnosis included benign (36 patients), borderline (six patients), and malignant (15 patients) ovarian masses, fallopian tube masses (15 patients), endometrial tumors (seven patients), cervical carcinomas (32 patients), subserous leiomyomas (11 patients), and two masses of extragenital origin. RESULTS. In the depiction of pelvic lesions, the sensitivity of contrast-enhanced MR imaging (96%) was equal to that of unenhanced T2-weighted imaging (97%). Contrast- enhanced images were useful in the definition of intratumoral architecture and tumor borders of 72 adnexal masses, resulting in better determination of malignancy (accuracy, 95%) than on T2-weighted images (85%). Size of viable tumor, differentiation of tumor from retained fluid, and depth of myometrial invasion of six endometrial carcinomas were most reliably shown on contrast-enhanced images. In the evaluation of cervical carcinoma, overall staging accuracy of contrast- enhanced imaging (80%) was slightly inferior to that of T2-weighted imaging (83%). However, contrast-enhanced images improved assessment of parametrial and organ invasion in seven cases in which findings on T2- weighted MR images were equivocal. Administration of contrast material was not helpful in the evaluation of subserous leiomyomas or masses of extragenital origin. CONCLUSIONS. The findings suggest that when results of unenhanced T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging of pelvic masses are equivocal, contrast-enhanced MR images should be used as supportive and complementary pulse sequences to (1) improve definition of intratumoral architecture and prediction of malignancy in adnexal tumors, (2) stage endometrial carcinoma, and (3) determine tumor extension in cervical carcinoma.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 RadiologyHome page
K. Kinkel, Y. Lu, A. Mehdizade, M.-F. Pelte, and H. Hricak
Indeterminate Ovarian Mass at US: Incremental Value of Second Imaging Test for Characterization--Meta-Analysis and Bayesian Analysis
Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 85 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.